Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37740119›Full record

ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2024

Response planning during question-answering: does deciding what to say involve deciding how to say it?

Ruth E Corps, Martin J Pickering

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ruth E CorpsPsychology of Language Department, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Ruth.Corps@mpi.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6027-8109
Martin J PickeringDepartment of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, 7 George Square, Edinburgh, EH8 9JZ, UK.

Funding

Economic and Social Research Council ES/J500136/1Leverhulme Trust RPG-2018-259
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To answer a question, speakers must determine their response and formulate it in words. But do they decide on a response before formulation, or do they formulate different potential answers before selecting one? We addressed this issue in a verbal question-answering experiment. Participants answered questions more quickly when they had one potential answer (e.g., Which tourist attraction in Paris is very tall?) than when they had multiple potential answers (e.g., What is the name of a Shakespeare play?). Participants also answered more quickly when the set of potential answers were on average short rather than long, regardless of whether there was only one or multiple potential answers. Thus, participants were not affected by the linguistic complexity of unselected but plausible answers. These findings suggest that participants select a single answer before formulation.

Indexed as

Verbal BehaviorAdultDecision MakingFemaleHumansMalePsycholinguisticsYoung AdultLanguage productionQuestion-answeringResponse planning

Identifiers

PMID37740119
PMCPMC11061006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.