Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37740111›Full record

ArticleMolecular diagnosis & therapy2023

Cell Therapy of Severe Ischemia in People with Diabetic Foot Ulcers-Do We Have Enough Evidence?

Michal Dubský, Jitka Husáková, Dominika Sojáková, Vladimíra Fejfarová, Edward B Jude

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular diagnosis & therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Michal DubskýInstitute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic. mids@ikem.cz.
Jitka HusákováInstitute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
Dominika SojákováInstitute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
Vladimíra FejfarováInstitute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
Edward B JudeDiabetes Center, Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust, Ashton Under Lyne, UK. Edward.jude@tgh.nhs.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-3186-4122
Charles University · CZInstitute of Clinical and Experimental Medicine · CZUniversity of Lancashire · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This current opinion article critically evaluates the efficacy of autologous cell therapy (ACT) for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI), especially in people with diabetes who are not candidates for standard revascularization. This treatment approach has been used in 'no-option' CLTI in the last two decades and more than 1700 patients have received ACT worldwide. Here we analyze the level of published evidence of ACT as well as our experience with this treatment method. Many studies have shown that ACT is safe and an effective method for patients with the most severe lower limb ischemia. However, some trials did not show any benefit of ACT, and there is some heterogeneity in the types of injected cells, route of administration and assessed endpoints. Nevertheless, we believe that ACT plays an important role in a comprehensive treatment of patients with diabetic foot and severe ischemia.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusDiabetic FootAmputation, SurgicalCell- and Tissue-Based TherapyHumansIschemiaRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID37740111
PMCPMC10590286
OpenAlexW4386951631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.