ArticleHeart and vessels2024
Postoperative evaluation of left atrial stiffness in patients with congenital heart diseases.
Article in Heart and vessels, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Application of Left Atrial Strain Based on Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking in Cardiovascular Diseases.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Left atrial (LA) stiffness is one of the most important factors involved in LA remodeling. LA stiffness has rarely been studied postoperatively in patients with congenital heart diseases (CHDs). This study aimed to evaluate LA stiffness in CHD patients postoperatively. Seventy-five patients (CHDs, 67; controls, 8; age range, 10-41 years) who underwent cardiac catheterization at our institution were included in this study. From the pulmonary artery wedge pressure waveform obtained during cardiac catheterization, the pressure range between the v wave and x trough was determined, and this value was divided by the LA reservoir strain obtained by echocardiography to calculate LA stiffness, as previously reported. LA stiffness was significantly higher in postoperative CHD patients than in controls (0.28 ± 0.17 vs. 0.13 ± 0.03, p = 0.001). Nineteen of 52 (37%) patients in their teens, 8 of 11 (73%) patients in their 20 s, and 1 of 4 (25%) patients aged > 30 years had elevated LA stiffness values. In particular, all patients with an LA reservoir strain < 20% had elevated LA stiffness. In postoperative CHD patients, LA stiffness was frequently elevated from a young age. CHD patients with elevated LA stiffness should be cautious of possible LA dysfunction in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.