Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37740038›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2023

Differential response of HER2-positive breast cancer to anti-HER2 therapy based on HER2 protein expression level.

N M Atallah, M Alsaleem, M S Toss, N P Mongan, E Rakha

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Application of nanoparticles in breast cancer treatment: a systematic review.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. GP100 expression is variable in intensity in melanoma.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

N M AtallahDivision of Cancer and Stem Cells, School of Medicine, the University of Nottingham and Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6845-5608
M AlsaleemUnit of Scientific Research, Applied College, Qassim University, Buraydah, Saudi Arabia.
M S TossHistopathology Department, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
N P MonganSchool of Veterinary Medicine and Sciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington, UK.
E RakhaDivision of Cancer and Stem Cells, School of Medicine, the University of Nottingham and Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK. emad.rakha@nottingham.ac.uk.
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBQassim University · SARoyal Hallamshire Hospital · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncreasing data indicate that HER2-positive (HER2 + ) breast cancer (BC) subtypes exhibit differential responses to targeted anti-HER2 therapy. This study aims to investigate these differences and the potential underlying molecular mechanisms.

methodsA large cohort of BC patients (n = 7390) was utilised. The clinicopathological characteristics and differential gene expression (DGE) of HER2+ immunohistochemical (IHC) subtypes, specifically HER2 IHC 3+ and IHC 2 + /Amplified, were assessed and correlated with pathological complete response (pCR) and survival in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings, respectively. The role of oestrogen receptor (ER) status was also investigated.

resultsCompared to HER2 IHC 3+ tumours, BC patients with IHC 2 + /Amplified showed a significantly lower pCR rate (22% versus 57%, P < 0.001), shorter survival regardless of HER2 gene copy number, were less classified as HER2 enriched, and enriched for trastuzumab resistance and ER signalling pathway genes. ER positivity significantly decreased response to anti-HER2 therapy in IHC 2 + /Amplified, but not in IHC 3 + BC patients.

conclusionIn HER2 + BC, overexpression of HER2 protein is the driver of the oncogenic pathway, and it is the main predictor of response to anti-HER2 therapy. ER signalling pathways are more dominant in BC with equivocal HER2 expression. personalised anti-HER2 therapy based on IHC classes should be considered.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansNeoadjuvant TherapyReceptors, EstrogenTrastuzumabErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesReceptors, EstrogenTrastuzumab

Identifiers

PMID37740038
PMCPMC10646129
OpenAlexW4386955471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.