ArticleHematology, transfusion and cell therapy2024
Autologous stem cell transplantation in patients older than 65 years with multiple myeloma: a real-world study.
Article in Hematology, transfusion and cell therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transplant in myeloma: what is its role?Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe treatment of elderly multiple myeloma (MM) patients with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is a controversial procedure. Most clinical trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of ASCT have primarily included patients younger than 65 years. DESIGN AND
methodsThis was a retrospective analysis of patients with MM who underwent ASCT between 2008 and 2018. Patients at or over 65 years were compared with patients under 65 years. We analyzed treatment-related mortality (TRM), response rate, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).
resultsTwo hundred and twenty-one patients were included: 50 patients at or over 65 years, (median age 68 years), including 7 patients over 70 years and 151 patients under 65 years, (median age 57 years). No differences were found in the neutrophil and platelet engraftment, median days of hospitalization and life support requirement during the hospitalization period for the ASCT. No statistically significant differences were found in the incidence of TRM between both groups at 100 days post-transplant (2% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.322). The ASCT improved complete response and stringent complete response rates (44% vs. 37%, p < 0.001). Survival was not modified by age: after a median follow-up of 53 months, the estimated PFS rates at three years were 63% and 60% (p = 0.88) and the OS rates at five years were 75% and 74% (p = 0.72), respectively.
conclusionsOur data suggest that the ASCT is feasible in selected elderly patients with MM over 65 years of age, achieving response and survival rates similar to those of younger patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.