Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37739812›Full record

ArticleGenome research2023

Analyses of 600+ insect genomes reveal repetitive element dynamics and highlight biodiversity-scale repeat annotation challenges.

John S Sproul, Scott Hotaling, Jacqueline Heckenhauer, Ashlyn Powell, Dez Marshall, Amanda M Larracuente, Joanna L Kelley, Steffen U Pauls, Paul B Frandsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Satellite DNA evolution in Tytonidae (Aves: Strigiformes): dynamic repeat landscapes despite conserved karyotypes.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Dual-line Genome-scale CRISPR Screening Enables Robust Target Gene Discovery.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Satellite DNA Genomics: The Ongoing Story.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

John S Sproul *Department of Biology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602, USA; johnssproul@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-6747-3537
Scott Hotaling *School of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington 99163, USA.
Jacqueline Heckenhauer *LOEWE Center for Translational Biodiversity Genomics (LOEWE-TBG), 60325 Frankfurt, Germany.
Ashlyn PowellDepartment of Plant and Wildlife Sciences, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602, USA.
Dez MarshallDepartment of Biology, University of Nebraska Omaha, Omaha, Nebraska 68182, USA.
Amanda M LarracuenteDepartment of Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5944-5686
Joanna L KelleySchool of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington 99163, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7731-605X
Steffen U PaulsLOEWE Center for Translational Biodiversity Genomics (LOEWE-TBG), 60325 Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6451-3425
Paul B FrandsenLOEWE Center for Translational Biodiversity Genomics (LOEWE-TBG), 60325 Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4801-7579

Funding

The evolutionary and functional genomics of satellite DNAR35GM119515 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Amanda Marie Larracuente · 2016 to 2026
$4.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM119515
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Repetitive elements (REs) are integral to the composition, structure, and function of eukaryotic genomes, yet remain understudied in most taxonomic groups. We investigated REs across 601 insect species and report wide variation in RE dynamics across groups. Analysis of associations between REs and protein-coding genes revealed dynamic evolution at the interface between REs and coding regions across insects, including notably elevated RE-gene associations in lineages with abundant long interspersed nuclear elements (LINEs). We leveraged this large, empirical data set to quantify impacts of long-read technology on RE detection and investigate fundamental challenges to RE annotation in diverse groups. In long-read assemblies, we detected ∼36% more REs than short-read assemblies, with long terminal repeats (LTRs) showing 162% increased detection, whereas DNA transposons and LINEs showed less respective technology-related bias. In most insect lineages, 25%-85% of repetitive sequences were "unclassified" following automated annotation, compared with only ∼13% in

Indexed as

GenomicsRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidDNA Transposable ElementsGenome, InsectTerminal Repeat SequencesDNA Transposable Elements

Identifiers

PMID37739812
PMCPMC10691545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.