Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37739474›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2023

Antenatal corticosteroids in specific groups at risk of preterm birth: a systematic review.

Kana Saito, Etsuko Nishimura, Erika Ota, Fumihiko Namba, Toshiyuki Swa, Jenny Ramson, Tina Lavin, Jenny Cao, Joshua Peter Vogel

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. The association between antenatal corticosteroids exposure and postnatal growth in infants born between 23 and 29 weeks of gestation.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Kana SaitoPediatrics, Saitama Medical Center, Kawagoe, Saitama, Japan kana988@live.jp.ORCID 0000-0001-7781-1870
Etsuko NishimuraGraduate School of Nursing Science, St Luke's International University, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7457-0642
Erika OtaGraduate School of Nursing Science, St Luke's International University, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3945-7441
Fumihiko NambaPediatrics, Saitama Medical Center, Kawagoe, Saitama, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6137-4477
Toshiyuki SwaDivision of Health Science, Osaka University School of Medicine Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Jenny RamsonMaternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Tina LavinDepartment of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneve, Switzerland.
Jenny CaoMaternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Joshua Peter VogelMaternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3214-7096
Burnet Institute · AUSocial Insurance Saitama Chuo Hospital · JPSt. Luke's International University · JPThe University of Osaka · JPWorld Health Organization · CH

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to synthesise available evidence on the efficacy of antenatal corticosteroid (ACS) therapy among women at risk of imminent preterm birth with pregestational/gestational diabetes, chorioamnionitis or fetal growth restriction (FGR), or planned caesarean section (CS) in the late preterm period.

methodsA systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Global Index Medicus was conducted for all comparative randomised or non-randomised interventional studies in the four subpopulations on 6 June 2021. Risk of Bias Assessment tool for Non-randomised Studies and the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool were used to assess the risk of bias. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluations tool assessed the certainty of evidence.

resultsThirty-two studies involving 5018 pregnant women and 10 819 neonates were included. Data on women with diabetes were limited, and evidence on women undergoing planned CS was inconclusive. ACS use was associated with possibly reduced odds of neonatal death (pooled OR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.31 to 0.85, low certainty), intraventricular haemorrhage (pooled OR: 0.41; 95% CI: 0.23 to 0.72, low certainty) and respiratory distress syndrome (pooled OR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.45 to 0.77, low certainty) in women with chorioamnionitis. Among women with FGR, the rates of surfactant use (pooled OR: 0.38; 95% CI: 0.23 to 0.62, moderate certainty), mechanical ventilation (pooled OR: 0.42; 95% CI: 0.26 to 0.66, moderate certainty) and oxygen therapy (pooled OR: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.30 to 0.77, moderate certainty) were probably reduced; however, the rate of hypoglycaemia probably increased (pooled OR: 2.06; 95% CI: 1.27 to 3.32, moderate certainty).

conclusionsThere is a paucity of evidence on ACS for women who have diabetes. ACS therapy may have benefits in women with chorioamnionitis and is probably beneficial in FGR. There is limited direct trial evidence on ACS efficacy in women undergoing planned CS in the late preterm period, though the totality of evidence suggests it is probably beneficial. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021267816.

Indexed as

ChorioamnionitisDiabetes, GestationalPremature BirthAdrenal Cortex HormonesCesarean SectionFemaleFetal Growth RetardationHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyAdrenal Cortex HormonesFetal medicineMaternal medicineNeonatal intensive & critical careNEONATOLOGYOBSTETRICSREPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE

Identifiers

PMID37739474
PMCPMC10533784
OpenAlexW4386969797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.