Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37739468›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Opportunities to enhance consumer and community engagement training for researchers and healthcare providers: a qualitative study.

Sandra Reeder, Darshini Ayton, Helena J Teede, Helen Skouteris, Melissa Simmons, Angela Jones

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sandra ReederMonash Centre for Health Research Implementation, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia sandra.reeder@monash.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7942-0179
Darshini AytonHealth and Social Care Unit, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2754-2024
Helena J TeedeMonash Centre for Health Research Implementation, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Helen SkouterisHealth and Social Care Unit, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9959-5750
Melissa SimmonsPublic contributor, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Angela JonesMonash Partners, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Monash Health · AUMonash University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo identify key training content for the education of researchers and healthcare providers in consumer and community engagement.

designA qualitative descriptive design, underpinned by pragmatism, involved semi-structured interviews and a focus group. We conducted a thematic analysis using a framework approach.

settingCommunity, hospital and university settings in Australia

participantsThis study involved 28 individual interviews with researchers, ethics officers, leaders from consumer organisations and a focus group with six people working in health service settings.

resultsKey findings from our study reveal a wide scope of consumer and community involvement (CCI) training content recommended for researchers and healthcare providers. Four main themes for training content were identified: (1) Embedding consumer and community involvement in research and health improvement projects; (2) Connecting with consumers and the community; (3) Considerations for consumer and community involvement; and (4) Progressing CCI in research and healthcare. Participants emphasised the importance of building foundational relationships with consumers and community, as well as connecting with experts. While how to partner authentically with consumers and the community was another important training topic raised, so too were the administrative considerations involved in CCI partnerships. Furthermore, the identification of training content including reducing duplication of effort, embedding CCI training into the education of healthcare providers and researchers and building an evidence base for CCI, shows the importance participants placed on investing in and advancing the field.

conclusionsA wide scope of training content is required to support CCI capacity building in researchers and healthcare providers. Key training content is recommended to cover practical, relational, administrative, ethical and logistical aspects of CCI as well as guidance about how to advance CCI practice and its evidence base. Future work needs to focus on how the training content can be successfully implemented, evaluated and updated.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelResearch PersonnelEducational StatusFocus GroupsHumansQualitative ResearchEDUCATION & TRAINING (see Medical Education & Training)Patient ParticipationQUALITATIVE RESEARCH

Identifiers

PMID37739468
PMCPMC10533718
OpenAlexW4386955867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.