Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37739313›Full record

ReviewIndian pacing and electrophysiology journal

Electrocardiographic lead reversals.

Amal Paul, John Roshan Jacob

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Indian pacing and electrophysiology journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Amal PaulMOSC Medical Mission Hospital, Kunnamkulam, Kerala, 680503, India. Electronic address: look_lama@yahoo.co.in.
John Roshan JacobDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiac Electrophysiology Unit, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Vellore, TN, 632002, India. Electronic address: johnroshanjacob@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Misplacement of cables during the recording of a 12-lead electrocardiogram [ECG] poses a non-negligible risk of creating panic and confusion at the bedside in daily clinical practice. Clinical awareness about the manifestations of commonly encountered electrode misplacements is imperative for avoiding misdiagnosis. A basic understanding of the electrophysiology behind these anomalous ECG tracings is likely to aid in prompt suspicion, accurate detection, and appropriate rectification in most cases. We discuss the abnormalities produced on 12-lead ECG tracings by the misplacement of electrode cables, with a focus on the clinical implications of the same. We suggest a mnemonic - 'SPIRAL' - as a quick screening criterion to detect commonly encountered lead reversals.

Identifiers

PMID37739313
PMCPMC10685096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.