Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37738554›Full record

SynthesisThe Journal of infectious diseases2024

Rotavirus Genotypes in the Postvaccine Era: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Global, Regional, and Temporal Trends by Rotavirus Vaccine Introduction.

Avnika B Amin, Jordan E Cates, Zihao Liu, Joanne Wu, Iman Ali, Alexia Rodriguez, Junaid Panjwani, Jacqueline E Tate, Benjamin A Lopman, Umesh D Parashar

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Journal of infectious diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Contribution of the EuroRotaNet surveillance network to rotavirus strain surveillance in Europe.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Avnika B AminRollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2212-2546
Jordan E CatesViral Gastroenteritis Branch, Division of Viral Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Zihao LiuRollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Joanne WuRollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Iman AliCenters for Disease Control and Prevention Foundation, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Alexia RodriguezRollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Junaid PanjwaniViral Gastroenteritis Branch, Division of Viral Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Jacqueline E TateViral Gastroenteritis Branch, Division of Viral Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Benjamin A LopmanRollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Umesh D ParasharViral Gastroenteritis Branch, Division of Viral Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Funding

Preparing for the SARS-CoV2 vaccine: Modeling of transmission pathways, viral evolution and vaccination strategiesR01GM124280 · NIGMS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI LOPMAN, BENJAMIN A · 2018 to 2022
$2.2M
Emerging methods and applications for test-negative studies of of infectious disease interventionsR01AI148127 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI JEWELL, NICHOLAS P · 2020 to 2023
$1.8M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI148127NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM124280NIH HHS R01 AI148127Vaccine Impact Modeling Consortium
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEven moderate differences in rotavirus vaccine effectiveness against nonvaccine genotypes may exert selective pressures on circulating rotaviruses. Whether this vaccine effect or natural temporal fluctuations underlie observed changes in genotype distributions is unclear.

methodsWe systematically reviewed studies reporting rotavirus genotypes from children <5 years of age globally between 2005 and 2023. We compared rotavirus genotypes between vaccine-introducing and nonintroducing settings globally and by World Health Organization (WHO) region, calendar time, and time since vaccine introduction.

resultsCrude pooling of genotype data from 361 studies indicated higher G2P[4], a nonvaccine genotype, prevalence in vaccine-introducing settings, both globally and by WHO region. This difference did not emerge when examining genotypes over time in the Americas, the only region with robust longitudinal data. Relative to nonintroducing settings, G2P[4] detections were more likely in settings with recent introduction (eg, 1-2 years postintroduction adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 4.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.87-6.72) but were similarly likely in settings with more time elapsed since introduction, (eg, 7 or more years aOR, 1.62; 95% CI, .49-5.37).

conclusionsWhen accounting for both regional and temporal trends, there was no substantial evidence of long-term vaccine-related selective pressures on circulating genotypes. Increased prevalence of G2P[4] may be transient after rotavirus vaccine introduction.

Indexed as

GenotypeRotavirusRotavirus InfectionsRotavirus VaccinesChild, PreschoolGlobal HealthHumansInfantVaccinationRotavirus Vaccinesgastroenteritisgenotypemeta-analysisreviewrotavirusstrainvaccine

Identifiers

PMID37738554
PMCPMC11095550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.