ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute2024
Processes for identifying caregivers and screening for caregiver and patient distress in community oncology: results from WF-1803CD.
Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- "Pathways": A hope-enhancing intervention for patients undergoing treatment for advanced lung cancer.Psycho-oncology · 2024Trial
- The national standards for cancer survivorship care in action: caregiver experiences across stage, phase, and geography.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Article
- Multi-site feasibility of a web-based and telephone navigation intervention to connect lung cancer caregivers in community oncology settings with resources: Protocol for the WF-2301CD Caregiver Oncology Needs Evaluation Tool (CONNECT) trial.Contemporary clinical trials · 2026Article
- Considering the caregiver in early-phase clinical trials: a review of trial protocols and consent forms.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Review
- Engaging community oncology stakeholders to plan multisite cancer caregiving research (CONNECT WF-2300CD).JNCI cancer spectrum · 2026Article
- Development of a Mobile App to Support Head and Neck Cancer Caregiving: Mixed Methods Study.JMIR cancer · 2025Article
- Patterns and influencing factors of savoring in caregivers of advanced cancer patients: a latent profile study.BMC psychology · 2025Article
- Recruitment of informal caregivers into community oncology research studies: results from the 2022 Landscape Assessment.The oncologist · 2024Article
- Breadth and Depth of Patient and Caregiver Supportive Services in Community Oncology (WF-1803CD).Psycho-oncology · 2024Article
- A dyadic analysis of financial toxicity and health-related quality of life among bone marrow transplant patients and their caregivers.Psycho-oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDespite their vital roles, informal caregivers of adult cancer patients are commonly overlooked in cancer care. This study describes processes for identifying cancer caregivers and processes for distress screening and management among caregivers and patients in the understudied community oncology setting.
methodsSupportive care leaders from the National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program practices completed online survey questions regarding caregiver identification, caregiver and patient distress screening, and distress management strategies. We described practice group characteristics and prevalence of study outcomes. Multivariable logistic regression explored associations between practice group characteristics and caregiver identification in the electronic health record (EHR).
resultsMost (64.9%, 72 of 111) supportive care leaders reported routine identification and documentation of informal caregivers; 63.8% record this information in the EHR. Only 16% routinely screen caregivers for distress, though 92.5% screen patients. Distress management strategies for caregivers and patients are widely available, yet only 12.6% are routinely identified and screened and had at least 1 referral strategy for caregivers with distress; 90.6% are routinely screened and had at least 1 referral strategy for patients. Practices with a free-standing outpatient clinic (odds ratio [OR] = 0.29, P = .0106) and academic affiliation (OR = 0.01, P = .04) were less likely to identify and document caregivers in the EHR. However, higher oncologist volume was associated with an increased likelihood of recording caregiver information in the EHR (OR = 1.04, P = .02).
conclusionsDespite high levels of patient distress screening and management, few practices provide comprehensive caregiver engagement practices. Existing patient engagement protocols may provide a promising platform to build capacity to better address caregiver needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.