Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37738058›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2023

High-Fluence Accelerated PACK-CXL for Bacterial Keratitis Using Riboflavin/UV-A or Rose Bengal/Green in the Ex Vivo Porcine Cornea.

Nan-Ji Lu, Hendrik Koliwer-Brandl, Mark Hillen, Adrian Egli, Farhad Hafezi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Effect of ultraviolet-A-induced corneal collagen cross-linking in the management ofSaudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Nan-Ji LuELZA Institute, Dietikon, Switzerland.
Hendrik Koliwer-BrandlInstitute of Medical Microbiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Mark HillenELZA Institute, Dietikon, Switzerland.
Adrian EgliInstitute of Medical Microbiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Farhad HafeziELZA Institute, Dietikon, Switzerland.
University of Zurich · CHELZA Institute · CHUniversity of Antwerp · BEUniversity of Geneva · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate and compare the efficacy of high-fluence accelerated photoactivated chromophore for keratitis-corneal cross-linking (PACK-CXL) using either riboflavin/ultraviolet (UV)-A light or rose bengal/green light to treat Staphylococcus aureus or Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in an ex vivo porcine cornea model. Methods: One hundred and seventeen ex vivo porcine corneas were injected with clinical isolates of S. aureus or P. aeruginosa, divided into eight groups, and cultured for 24 hours. Then, either riboflavin with UV-A light irradiation (30 mW/cm2; 8 minutes, 20 seconds; 15 J/cm2) or rose bengal with green light irradiation (15 mW/cm2, 16 minutes, 40 seconds; 15 J/cm2) was applied; unirradiated infected groups served as controls. All corneas were incubated for another 24 hours. Next, corneal buttons were obtained and vortexed to release the bacterial cells. The irradiated and unirradiated solutions were then plated and incubated on agar plates. The amount of colony-forming units was quantified and the bacterial killing ratios (BKRs) resulting from different PACK-CXL protocols relative to non-treated controls were calculated. Results: Riboflavin/UV-A light PACK-CXL resulted in median BKRs of 52.8% and 45.8% in S. aureus and P. aeruginosa, respectively, whereas rose bengal/green light PACK-CXL resulted in significantly greater BKRs of 76.7% and 81.0%, respectively (both P < 0.01). Conclusions: Both accelerated PACK-CXL protocols significantly decreased S. aureus and P. aeruginosa bacterial loads. Comparing the riboflavin/UV-A light and rose bengal/green light PACK-CXL approaches in the same experimental setup may help develop strain-specific and depth-dependent PACK-CXL approaches that could be used alongside the current standard of care. Translational Relevance: Our study used an animal model to gain insight into the efficacy of high-fluence accelerated PACK-CXL using either riboflavin/UV-A light or rose bengal/green light to treat Staphylococcus aureus or Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections.

Indexed as

Eye Infections, BacterialKeratitisPseudomonas InfectionsAnimalsCorneaRiboflavinRose BengalStaphylococcus aureusSwineRiboflavinRose Bengal

Identifiers

PMID37738058
PMCPMC10519434
OpenAlexW4386945446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.