ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2024
Phage Immunoprecipitation Sequencing (PhIP-Seq) for Analyzing Antibody Epitope Repertoires Against Food Antigens.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Iterative immunoprecipitation and phage pre-wash dramatically improve epitope-resolved serology by VirScan.Frontiers in virology (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While thousands of food and environmental allergens have been reported, conventional methods for allergy testing typically rely on measuring immunoglobulin E (IgE) binding against panels of dozens to hundreds of antigens. Beyond IgE, also the specificity of other Ig (sub-)classes such as IgG4, has gained interest because of a potential protective role toward allergy.Phage immunoprecipitation sequencing (PhIP-Seq) allows to study hundreds of thousands of rationally selected peptide antigens and to resolve binding specificities of different Ig classes. This technology combines synthetic DNA libraries encoding antigens, with the display on the surface of T7 bacteriophages and next-generation sequencing (NGS) for quantitative readouts. Thereby binding of entire Ig repertoires can be measured to detect the exact epitopes of food allergens and to study potential cross-reactivity.In this chapter, we provide a summary of both the key experimental steps and various strategies for analyzing PhIP-Seq datasets, as well as comparing the advantages and disadvantages of this methodology for measuring antibody responses against food antigens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37737980What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.