Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37737872›Full record

ReviewEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2023

Monozygotic twins and cholesteatomas: nature or nuture?

Sabrina Brar, Dennis M Wolf, Morad Faoury, Julian Barwell, Anand Saggar, Hamid Daya

Abstract readCase ReportsReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sabrina BrarDepartment of Otolaryngology, St George's University Hospital, London, UK. sb1816@my.bristol.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9935-3911
Dennis M WolfDepartment of Otolaryngology, St George's University Hospital, London, UK.
Morad FaouryDepartment of Otolaryngology, St George's University Hospital, London, UK.
Julian BarwellDepartment of Genetics, St George's University Hospital, London, UK.
Anand SaggarDepartment of Genetics, St George's University Hospital, London, UK.
Hamid DayaDepartment of Otolaryngology, St George's University Hospital, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCholesteatoma is a rare middle ear pathology. It can be classified into acquired and congenital forms. Although benign, cholesteatomas can cause significant morbidity including hearing loss, infection, facial palsy and thrombosis. Congenital cholesteatomas are incredibly rare and bilateral disease has not commonly been published in the literature.

methodWe describe the case of female identical (monozygotic, monochorionic, diamniotic) twins who both developed congenital cholesteatomas. In this report, we review the aetiology, treatment, embryology and pathology of cholesteatoma.

resultsThe patients have been followed up 15 years after their initial surgery with promising results - pure-tone audiometry and repeat scans have not illustrated any disease recurrence.

conclusionThis paper presents one of the only cases of female monozygotic twins presenting with unilateral and bilateral cholesteatomas.

Indexed as

CholesteatomaCholesteatoma, Middle EarAudiometry, Pure-ToneEar, MiddleFemaleHumansTwins, MonozygoticCholesteatomaCongenitalIdentical twinsMonozygotic

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.