ArticleActa orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica2023
Clinical and radiographic outcomes of negative pressure wound therapy combined with polymethylmethacrylate sealant for wound management of Gustilo type III open tibia fractures.
Article in Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effectiveness of negative pressure wound therapy in treating deep surgical site infections after spine surgery: a meta-analysis of single-arm studies.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to introduce a new wound management method combining negative pressure wound therapy and polymethylmethacrylate sealant for Gustilo type III open tibia fractures and to evaluate its clinical outcomes.
methodsAmong 186 patients who visited our institution for the treatment of open tibia fractures between January 2016 and December 2019, 20 male patients who sustained Gustilo type III open tibia fractures and were compelled to undergo delayed flap coverage using negative pressure wound therapy combined with polymethylmethacrylate sealant due to initial critical condition were enrolled in this study. We retrospectively investigated patients' demographics, interval between the injury and flap coverage, number of negative pressure wound therapy changes, flap survival, bone union time, and infection-induced complications.
resultsThe mean interval from injury until flap coverage was 27.8 (range, 8-63) days. Most soft-tissue defects were reconstructed using free flaps (14/20, 70%); the anterolateral thigh flap was the most frequently used flap (12/20, 60%) in this study. Among 20 flaps trans- ferred, 16 flaps (80%) survived uneventfully, 1 flap (5%) developed partial necrosis, and 3 flaps (15%) failed. The mean follow-up period was 22.7 (range, 12- 43) months. A total of 17 patients (85%) achieved tibia fracture union. The mean bone union time was 31 (range, 12-81) weeks. With regard to infection-induced complications, 3 patients (15%) developed osteomyelitis and no patient showed superficial surgical site infection.
conclusionCombination therapy using negative pressure wound therapy and polymethylmethacrylate sealant serves as a useful and reliable therapeutic strategy for wound management of Gustilo type III open tibia fractures, especially when delayed soft-tissue recon- struction is unavoidable. Corresponding author: Yoo Joon Sur yoojoon@catholic.ac.kr Content of this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, Therapeutic Study.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.