ArticleScientific reports2023
SL-scan identifies synthetic lethal interactions in cancer using metabolic networks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- DORSSAA: Drug-Target interactOmics Resource Based on Stability/Solubility Alteration Assay.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2026Article
- Informative Missingness in Nominal Data: A Graph-Theoretic Approach to Revealing Hidden Structure.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- Metabolic Connectome and Its Role in the Prediction, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Complex Diseases.Metabolites · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Exploiting synthetic lethality is a promising strategy for developing targeted cancer therapies. However, identifying clinically significant synthetic lethal (SL) interactions among a large number of gene combinations is a challenging computational task. In this study, we developed the SL-scan pipeline based on metabolic network modeling to discover SL interaction. The SL-scan pipeline identifies the association between simulated Flux Balance Analysis knockout scores and mutation data across cancer cell lines and predicts putative SL interactions. We assessed the concordance of the SL pairs predicted by SL-scan with those of obtained from analysis of the CRISPR, shRNA, and PRISM datasets. Our results demonstrate that the SL-scan pipeline outperformed existing SL prediction approaches based on metabolic networks in identifying SL pairs in various cancers. This study emphasizes the importance of integrating multiple data sources, particularly mutation data, when identifying SL pairs for targeted cancer therapies. The findings of this study may lead to the development of novel targeted cancer therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.