ArticleNature communications2023
High-resolution single-photon imaging with physics-informed deep learning.
Article in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spatiotemporal information fusion for photon-level dynamic imaging.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Data-driven dynamic modeling for inverter-based resources using neural networks.Nature communications · 2025Article
- A PHYSICS-GUIDED SMOOTHING METHOD FOR MATERIAL MODELING WITH DIGITAL IMAGE CORRELATION (DIC) MEASUREMENTS.Proceedings. International Conference on Image Processing · 2025Article
- Ultrahigh-throughput single-pixel complex-field microscopy with frequency-comb acousto-optic coherent encoding (FACE).Light, science & applications · 2025Article
- 10-km passive drone detection using broadband quantum compressed sensing imaging.Light, science & applications · 2025Article
- Reconsidering the spectral distribution of light: Do people perceive watts or photons?Lighting research & technology (London, England : 2001) · 2024Article
- Ultra-fast light-field microscopy with event detection.Light, science & applications · 2024Article
- Deep Learning-Based Visual Complexity Analysis of Electroencephalography Time-Frequency Images: Can It Localize the Epileptogenic Zone in the Brain?Algorithms · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
High-resolution single-photon imaging remains a big challenge due to the complex hardware manufacturing craft and noise disturbances. Here, we introduce deep learning into SPAD, enabling super-resolution single-photon imaging with enhancement of bit depth and imaging quality. We first studied the complex photon flow model of SPAD electronics to accurately characterize multiple physical noise sources, and collected a real SPAD image dataset (64 × 32 pixels, 90 scenes, 10 different bit depths, 3 different illumination flux, 2790 images in total) to calibrate noise model parameters. With this physical noise model, we synthesized a large-scale realistic single-photon image dataset (image pairs of 5 different resolutions with maximum megapixels, 17250 scenes, 10 different bit depths, 3 different illumination flux, 2.6 million images in total) for subsequent network training. To tackle the severe super-resolution challenge of SPAD inputs with low bit depth, low resolution, and heavy noise, we further built a deep transformer network with a content-adaptive self-attention mechanism and gated fusion modules, which can dig global contextual features to remove multi-source noise and extract full-frequency details. We applied the technique in a series of experiments including microfluidic inspection, Fourier ptychography, and high-speed imaging. The experiments validate the technique's state-of-the-art super-resolution SPAD imaging performance.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.