ArticleScientific reports2023
Texture feature analysis of MRI-ADC images to differentiate glioma grades using machine learning techniques.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early Prediction of Volumetric Progression in Sellar-Parasellar Meningiomas Using Delta Radiomics on 6-Month MRI Following Gamma Knife Radiosurgery.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Quantitative Preclinical Imaging as a Metrological Framework: Reproducibility, Validation, and Translational Maturity.Journal of imaging · 2026Review
- Beyond binary classification: a pilot study of imaging-derived glioma severity modeling using T1-weighted and diffusion MRI radiomics.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Integrating preoperative imaging and clinical factors: a nomogram for predicting functional outcomes after rotator cuff repair.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Predicting the molecular subtypes of 2021 WHO grade 4 glioma by a multiparametric MRI-based machine learning model.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Stochastic differential equation modeling approach for grading astrocytomas on brain MRI images.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Radiomics-based prediction of pathological subtypes in peripheral neuroblastic tumors usingEuropean journal of pediatrics · 2025Observational
- A Combined Approach Using T2*-Weighted Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast MRI Perfusion Parameters and Radiomics to Differentiate Between Radionecrosis and Glioma Progression: A Proof-of-Concept Study.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The Role of b-value Diffusion-weighted Imaging in Differentiating High-grade and Low-grade Brain Tumors: A Comprehensive Study with Standard b-value DWI.Advanced biomedical research · 2025Article
- Feasibility study of computed tomography texture analysis for evaluation of canine primary adrenal gland tumors.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2023Article
- Integrating deep learning and thermal estimation for enhanced MRI-based brain tumor diagnosis.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an indispensable imaging technique in clinical neuroimaging that quantitatively assesses the diffusivity of water molecules within tissues using diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). This study focuses on developing a robust machine learning (ML) model to predict the aggressiveness of gliomas according to World Health Organization (WHO) grading by analyzing patients' demographics, higher-order moments, and grey level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) texture features of ADC. A population of 722 labeled MRI-ADC brain image slices from 88 human subjects was selected, where gliomas are labeled as glioblastoma multiforme (WHO-IV), high-grade glioma (WHO-III), and low-grade glioma (WHO I-II). Images were acquired using 3T-MR systems and a region of interest (ROI) was delineated manually over tumor areas. Skewness, kurtosis, and statistical texture features of GLCM (mean, variance, energy, entropy, contrast, homogeneity, correlation, prominence, and shade) were calculated using ADC values within ROI. The ANOVA f-test was utilized to select the best features to train an ML model. The data set was split into training (70%) and testing (30%) sets. The train set was fed into several ML algorithms and selected most promising ML algorithm using K-fold cross-validation. The hyper-parameters of the selected algorithm were optimized using random grid search technique. Finally, the performance of the developed model was assessed by calculating accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 values reported for the test set. According to the ANOVA f-test, three attributes; patient gender (1.48), GLCM energy (9.48), and correlation (13.86) that performed minimum scores were excluded from the dataset. Among the tested algorithms, the random forest classifier(0.8772 ± 0.0237) performed the highest mean-cross-validation score and selected to build the ML model which was able to predict tumor categories with an accuracy of 88.14% over the test set. The study concludes that the developed ML model using the above features except for patient gender, GLCM energy, and correlation, has high prediction accuracy in glioma grading. Therefore, the outcomes of this study enable to development of advanced tumor classification applications that assist in the decision-making process in a real-time clinical environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.