Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37737192›Full record

ArticleVirology journal2023

Investigating the interactions of endornaviruses with each other and with other viruses in common bean, Phaseolus vulgaris.

Thomas J Brine, Satish B Viswanathan, Alex M Murphy, Adrienne E Pate, Francis O Wamonje, John P Carr

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Virology journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas J BrineDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EA, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5116-8511
Satish B ViswanathanDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EA, UK.
Alex M MurphyDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EA, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2226-8759
Adrienne E PateDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EA, UK.
Francis O WamonjeDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EA, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4111-7884
John P CarrDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EA, UK. jpc1005@cam.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5028-2160
University of Cambridge · GBEast Malling Research (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J011762/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/P023223/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/W510609/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPlant viruses of the genus Alphaendornavirus are transmitted solely via seed and pollen and generally cause no apparent disease. It has been conjectured that certain plant endornaviruses may confer advantages on their hosts through improved performance (e.g., seed yield) or resilience to abiotic or biotic insult. We recently characterised nine common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) varieties that harboured either Phaseolus vulgaris endornavirus (PvEV1) alone, or PvEV1 in combination with PvEV2 or PvEV1 in combination with PvEV2 and PvEV3. Here, we investigated the interactions of these endornaviruses with each other, and with three infectious pathogenic viruses: cucumber mosaic virus (CMV), bean common mosaic virus (BCMV), and bean common mosaic necrosis virus (BCMNV).

resultsIn lines harbouring PvEV1, PvEV1 and PvEV2, or PvEV1, PvEV2 plus PvEV3, the levels of PvEV1 and PvEV3 RNA were very similar between lines, although there were variations in PvEV2 RNA accumulation. In plants inoculated with infectious viruses, CMV, BCMV and BCMNV levels varied between lines, but this was most likely due to host genotype differences rather than to the presence or absence of endornaviruses. We tested the effects of endornaviruses on seed production and seedborne transmission of infectious pathogenic viruses but found no consistent relationship between the presence of endornaviruses and seed yield or protection from seedborne transmission of infectious pathogenic viruses.

conclusionsIt was concluded that endornaviruses do not interfere with each other's accumulation. There appears to be no direct synergy or competition between infectious pathogenic viruses and endornaviruses, however, the effects of host genotype may obscure interactions between endornaviruses and infectious viruses. There is no consistent effect of endornaviruses on seed yield or susceptibility to seedborne transmission of other viruses.

Indexed as

CucumovirusCytomegalovirus InfectionsPhaseolusPotyvirusRNARNAPersistent virusViral cross-protectionViral mutualismViral synergy

Identifiers

PMID37737192
PMCPMC10515030
OpenAlexW4386944003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.