Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37737050›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine2023

Rehabilitation therapy using the HUBER platform in chronic non-specific low back pain: a randomized controlled trial.

Vincent LE Moal, Mélanie Tantot, Éric Mévellec, Isabelle Nouy-Trollé, Emmanuelle Lemoine-Josse, Florent Besnier, Thibaut Guiraud

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05437016 (Effectiveness of Functional Rehabilitation With HUBER Platform Compared to a Standard Program, on the Flexion/Extension Ratio of the Spine, in Patients With Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05437016 naunknown statusnot on this map

Effectiveness of Functional Rehabilitation With HUBER Platform Compared to a Standard Program, on the Flexion/Extension Ratio of the Spine, in Patients With Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorThibaut GuiraudRan2022 to 2023Enrolled70ConditionsChronic Low-back PainArmsHUBER exercises, Standard exercises
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vincent LE MoalTreboul Functional Rehabilitation Center, ORPEA/CLINEA, Douarnenez, France.
Mélanie TantotTreboul Functional Rehabilitation Center, ORPEA/CLINEA, Douarnenez, France.
Éric MévellecTreboul Functional Rehabilitation Center, ORPEA/CLINEA, Douarnenez, France.
Isabelle Nouy-TrolléTreboul Functional Rehabilitation Center, ORPEA/CLINEA, Douarnenez, France.
Emmanuelle Lemoine-JosseTreboul Functional Rehabilitation Center, ORPEA/CLINEA, Douarnenez, France.
Florent BesnierResearch and ÉPIC Center, Montreal Heart Institute, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Thibaut GuiraudTreboul Functional Rehabilitation Center, ORPEA/CLINEA, Douarnenez, France - t.guiraud@orpea.net.
Montreal Heart Institute · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNon-specific chronic low back pain (NSCLBP) refers to a complex condition that involves structural, biomechanical, cognitive, psychological, social, and lifestyle issues. First-line therapies include physical therapy and exercise, as well as psychological follow-up and pain medication.

aimThe aim of this study was to assess the impact of a 6-week center-based program using a multi-axis motorized platform (HUBER) connected with force sensors, that allows the patients to execute isometric exercises on the spine flexion-to-extension ratio at 60 and 120°/s, pain, trunk flexibility, and disability.

designThe design of the study was prospective, active control, parallel-group, assessor-blinded, randomized controlled trial.

settingThe setting was outpatients physical therapy clinic. POPULATION: The population analyzed presented NSCLBP.

methodsSeventy individuals with NSCLBP were randomized into 2 intervention arms (1:1 ratio): 1/standard rehabilitation group (STAND) with physiotherapy, balneotherapy and cycloergometer exercises and 2/HUBER rehabilitation group (HUB) with physiotherapy, balneotherapy and HUBER exercises. Both programs lasted 6 weeks, with 4 sessions of 2 hours each per week.

resultsEach group reported statistically significant improvements on the isokinetic spine strength, flexibility of the trunk, lumbar joint mobility, muscular endurance of the trunk and of the lower limbs, pain score and disability (P<0.05). The spine flexion/extension ratio at 60˚/s improved similarly between groups (-22.23 for HUB, and -13.04 for STAND; P=0.178) with a greater effect size in HUB. Only HUB reported a significant improvement in the spine flexion-to-extension ratio at 120˚/s (from 87.3 to 78.6, P=0.012). HUB reported a greater decrease in the Oswestry Disability Index (-16.83) compared to STAND (-12.11), with a statistically significant effect between groups (P=0.036).

conclusionsExercises performed on the HUBER platform added to physiotherapy and balneotherapy are as effective as a standard rehabilitation program with physiotherapy, balneotherapy and cycloergometer exercises to improve isokinetic spine strength, lumbar joint mobility, flexibility and muscular endurance of the trunk and the lower limbs. In addition, exercising with the HUBER platform result in a greater reduction in disability compared to a standard rehabilitation program (clinicalTrials.gov: NCT05437016). CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: A variety of intervention techniques, including supervised exercise and manual therapy are now used to manage persistent NSCLBP. The added value of the HUBER device on disability suggests that the platform could be beneficial.

Indexed as

Low Back PainExercise TherapyHumansPain MeasurementProspective StudiesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID37737050
PMCPMC10865107
OpenAlexW4386944981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.