Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37736988›Full record

ReviewTomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.)2023

An Updated Review on Imaging and Staging of Anal Cancer-Not Just Rectal Cancer.

Alessio Congedo, Davide Mallardi, Ginevra Danti, Federica De Muzio, Vincenza Granata, Vittorio Miele

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review of Various Perianal Lesions on CT and MRI.Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology · 2025
    Review
  5. MR Imaging of Anal Cancer.Radiologic clinics of North America · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Factors Influencing Outcomes and Survival in Anal Cancer.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alessio CongedoDepartment of Radiology, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy.
Davide MallardiDepartment of Radiology, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy.
Ginevra DantiDepartment of Radiology, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7109-8119
Federica De MuzioDepartment of Medicine and Health Sciences V. Tiberio, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy.
Vincenza GranataDivision of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale-IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6601-3221
Vittorio MieleDepartment of Radiology, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7848-1567
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · ITIstituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" · ITUniversity of Molise · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anal cancer is a rare disease, but its incidence has been increasing steadily. Primary staging and assessment after chemoradiation therapy are commonly performed using MRI, which is considered to be the preferred imaging modality. CT and PET/CT are useful in evaluating lymph node metastases and distant metastatic disease. Anal squamous-cell carcinoma (ASCC) and rectal adenocarcinoma are typically indistinguishable on MRI, and a biopsy prior to imaging is necessary to accurately stage the tumor and determine the treatment approach. This review discusses the histology, MR technique, diagnosis, staging, and treatment of anal cancer, with a particular focus on the differences in TNM staging between anal and rectal carcinomas. PURPOSE: This review discusses the histology, MR technique, diagnosis, staging, and treatment of anal cancer, with a particular focus on the differences in TNM staging between anal squamous-cell carcinoma (ASCC) and rectal adenocarcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: To conduct this updated review, a comprehensive literature search was performed using prominent medical databases, including PubMed and Embase. The search was limited to articles published within the last 10 years (2013-2023) to ensure their relevance to the current state of knowledge. INCLUSION CRITERIA: (1) articles that provided substantial information on the diagnostic techniques used for ASCC, mainly focusing on imaging, were included; (2) studies reporting on emerging technologies; (3) English-language articles. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: articles that did not meet the inclusion criteria, case reports, or articles with insufficient data. The primary outcome of this review is to assess the accuracy and efficacy of different diagnostic modalities, including CT, MRI, and PET, in diagnosing ASCC. The secondary outcomes are as follows: (1) to identify any advancements or innovations in diagnostic techniques for ASCC over the past decade; (2) to highlight the challenges and limitations of the diagnostic process.

resultsASCC is a rare disease; however, its incidence has been steadily increasing. Primary staging and assessment after chemoradiation therapy are commonly performed using MRI, which is considered to be the preferred imaging modality. CT and PET/CT are useful in evaluating lymph node metastases and distant metastatic disease.

conclusionASCC and rectal adenocarcinoma are the most common histological subtypes and are typically indistinguishable on MRI; therefore, a biopsy prior to imaging is necessary to stage the tumor accurately and determine the treatment approach.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAnus NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Squamous CellRectal NeoplasmsHumansLymphatic MetastasisPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyRare Diseasesanal canalanal cancerrectal cancerstagingTNM

Identifiers

PMID37736988
PMCPMC10514831
OpenAlexW4386417719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.