Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37736970›Full record

ArticleMethods and protocols2023

A Robust and Standardized Approach to Quantify Wound Closure Using the Scratch Assay.

Stefan Balko, Evan Kerr, Edward Buchel, Sarvesh Logsetty, Afshin Raouf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods and protocols, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Wound Healing Assay.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Stefan BalkoDepartment of Immunology, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0W2, Canada.
Evan KerrDepartment of Immunology, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0W2, Canada.
Edward BuchelDepartment of Surgery, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0W2, Canada.
Sarvesh LogsettyDepartment of Surgery, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0W2, Canada.
Afshin RaoufDepartment of Immunology, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3E 0W2, Canada.

Funding

Manitoba firefighters Burn Fund 51399University of Manitoba 321561
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The scratch assay is an in vitro assay that allows for high-throughput quantification of wound closure by keratinocytes and fibroblasts with relative ease. However, this assay is amenable to experimental variables, which can result in false-positive and false-negative data, making the interpretation of such data difficult. Also, data variability decreases the sensitivity of the scratch assay. Here, we identify important sources of data variation in the scratch assay and provide rational mitigation strategies that enable robust and highly reproducible quantification of scratch width and area, and ultimately the scratch closure rates. By eliminating these sources of variability, the sensitivity of the scratch assay is enhanced, thereby allowing for identification of dependent variables with wide-ranging impacts on wound closure in a robust and standardized manner.

Indexed as

dermal fibroblastskeratinocyteswound healing

Identifiers

PMID37736970
PMCPMC10514857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.