Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37736930›Full record

ReviewClinics and practice2023

Traditional and Recent Root Canal Irrigation Methods and Their Effectiveness: A Review.

Alfredo Iandolo, Massimo Pisano, Alessio Buonavoglia, Francesco Giordano, Alessandra Amato, Dina Abdellatif

RetractedOpen access · goldAbstract readReviewRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Review in Clinics and practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Alfredo IandoloDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, School of Dentistry, University of Salerno, 84081 Salerno, Italy.
Massimo PisanoDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, School of Dentistry, University of Salerno, 84081 Salerno, Italy.
Alessio BuonavogliaDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Bologna, 40125 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1044-2027
Francesco GiordanoDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, School of Dentistry, University of Salerno, 84081 Salerno, Italy.
Alessandra AmatoDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, School of Dentistry, University of Salerno, 84081 Salerno, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8159-9785
Dina AbdellatifDepartment of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Alexandria, Alexandria 21531, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0003-2249-2213
University of Salerno · ITAlexandria University · EGUniversity of Bologna · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

According to contemporary dental standards, the primary goal of endodontic therapy is the chemo-mechanical cleaning of the complex root canal system. Watering root canals with approved solutions and activating them are essential parts of this operation. This review outlines various irrigant activation methods for root canal therapy. Specifically, a comparison among the methods of manual dynamic activation, sonics (subsonic, sonic, and ultrasonic), internal heating, and lasers, was conducted. The results in this work were gathered using Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and PubMed databases by searching the following keywords: sodium hypochlorite, cleaning, activation, and irrigation methods. The present work concluded that the use of irrigant activation has a greater benefit than its absence. Regardless, it is impossible to point to a single effective activation method.

Indexed as

cleaningendodonticsirrigant activationNaOClroot canal treatment

Identifiers

PMID37736930
PMCPMC10514886
OpenAlexW4386219255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.