Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37736849›Full record

ArticleCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2023

GK-1 effectively reduces angiogenesis and prevents T cell exhaustion in a breast cancer murine experimental model.

Juan A Hernández-Aceves, Jacquelynne Cervantes-Torres, Diana Torres-García, Francisco J Zuñiga-Flores, Osiris J Patiño-Chávez, Jorge A Peña Agudelo, José Eduardo Aguayo-Flores, Yonathan Garfias, Laura Montero-León, Laura Romero-Romero and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Toxicology reports · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Juan A Hernández-AcevesDepartamento de Inmunología, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.
Jacquelynne Cervantes-TorresDepartamento de Inmunología, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.
Diana Torres-GarcíaDepartamento de Inmunología, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.
Francisco J Zuñiga-FloresDepartamento de Biología Celular y Tisular, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.
Osiris J Patiño-ChávezDepartamento de Inmunología, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.
Jorge A Peña AgudeloDepartamento de Inmunología, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.
José Eduardo Aguayo-FloresUnidad de Investigación, Conde de Valenciana, Instituto de Oftalmología, Mexico City, Mexico.
Yonathan GarfiasUnidad de Investigación, Conde de Valenciana, Instituto de Oftalmología, Mexico City, Mexico.
Laura Montero-LeónDepartamento de Inmunología, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.
Laura Romero-RomeroDepartamento de Patología, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Circuito Escolar, Ciudad Universitaria, Mexico City, Mexico.
Armando Pérez-TorresDepartamento de Biología Celular y Tisular, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico. armandop@unam.mx.
Gladis FragosoDepartamento de Inmunología, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico. gladis@unam.mx.
Edda SciuttoDepartamento de Inmunología, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico. edda@unam.mx.
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MX

Funding

Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología 30296Dirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México IN218822Dirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México IT2033418
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer is the leading malignancy in women worldwide, both in terms of incidence and mortality. Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the type with the worst clinical outcomes and with fewer therapeutic options than other types of breast cancer. GK-1 is a peptide that in the experimental model of the metastatic 4T1 breast cancer has demonstrated anti-tumor and anti-metastatic properties. Herein, GK-1 (5 mg/kg, i.v.) weekly administrated not only decreases tumor growth and the number of lung macro-metastases but also lung and lymph nodes micro-metastases. Histological analysis reveals that GK-1 reduced 57% of the intra-tumor vascular areas, diminished the leukemoid reaction's progression, and the spleens' weight and length. A significant reduction in VEGF-C, SDF-1, angiopoietin-2, and endothelin-1 angiogenic factors was induced. Moreover, GK-1 prevents T cell exhaustion in the tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) decreasing PD-1 expression. It also increased IFN-γ and granzyme-B expression and the cytotoxic activity of CD8

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsAnimalsCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesFemaleHumansLymphocytes, Tumor-InfiltratingMicePrognosisT-Cell ExhaustionAntineoplastic Agents4T1-modelAngiogenesisBreast cancerGK-1ImmunotherapyT cell exhaustion

Identifiers

PMID37736849
PMCPMC10576684
OpenAlexW4386944811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.