ArticleEJNMMI physics2023
Performance study of a 360° CZT camera for monitoring
Article in EJNMMI physics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantitative accuracy ofEJNMMI physics · 2026Article
- 3D-ring CZT gamma cameras in theranostics: is it a revolution?EJNMMI reports · 2026Article
- A critical phantom study of the energy window used forEJNMMI physics · 2025Article
- Quantitative capabilities of commercial CZT SPECT-CT cameras withEJNMMI physics · 2025Article
- Individual and Simultaneous Imaging ofIEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences · 2025Article
- Bias and precision of SPECT-basedEJNMMI physics · 2024Article
- 360° CZT-SPECT/CT cameras:EJNMMI physics · 2024Article
- EANM perspectives for CZT SPECT in brain applications.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024Article
- A review of 177Lu dosimetry workflows: how to reduce the imaging workloads?EJNMMI physics · 2024Review
- Comparison of a 3D CZT and conventional SPECT/CT system for quantitative Lu-177 SPECT imaging.EJNMMI physics · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this study was to investigate the quantification performance of a 360° CZT camera for
methodsThree phantoms with known
resultsOptimised quantification parameters were determined to be: CT-based attenuation correction, scatter correction, 12 iterations, 8 subsets and no filter. ARC, CRC and RMS results were dependant on the methodology used for calculations. Two different reconstruction parameters were recommended for visualisation and for quantification. 3D whole-body SPECT images were acquired and reconstructed for
conclusionQuantification of whole-body 3D images of patients treated with
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.