ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2024
Application of bone cement directly to the implant in primary total knee arthroplasty. Short-term radiological and clinical follow-up of two different cementing techniques.
Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Higher bone cement volume in total knee arthroplasty lowers the risk of postoperative radiolucent lines.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to optimize cement application techniques in fully cemented primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) by comparing the effects of two different approaches: cement on bone surface (CoB) versus cement on bone surface and implant surface (CoBaI) on the short-term presence of radiolucent lines (RLL) as indicators of potential complications.
methodsIn this monocentric study, a total of 379 fully cemented primary TKAs (318 patients) were included. The two study groups were differentiated by the technique of cement application: CoB group (cement applied only on bone surface) and CoBaI group (cement applied on both bone surface and implant surface). The presence of RLL or osteolysis was evaluated using the updated Knee Society Radiographic Evaluation System.
resultsIn the whole study population, RLL were present in 4.7% of cases, with a significantly higher incidence in the CoBaI group (10.5%) at the 4-week follow-up. At the 12-month follow-up, RLL were observed in 29.8% of TKAs in the CoBaI group, while the incidence was lower in the CoB group (24.0%) (not statistically significant). There were two revisions in each group, none of which were due to aseptic loosening.
conclusionThe findings of this study suggest that the application of bone cement on bone surface only (CoB) may be more beneficial than applying it on both bone surface and implant surface (CoBaI) in terms of short-term presence of RLL in fully cemented primary TKA. Long-term results, especially with regard to aseptic loosening, will be of interest and may provide valuable guidance for future directions in bone cement applications in TKA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.