Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37736713›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2023

GhIMP10D, an inositol monophosphates family gene, enhances ascorbic acid and antioxidant enzyme activities to confer alkaline tolerance in Gossypium hirsutum L.

Yapeng Fan, Fanjia Peng, Ruifeng Cui, Shuai Wang, Yupeng Cui, Xuke Lu, Hui Huang, Kesong Ni, Xiaoyu Liu, Tiantian Jiang and 14 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yapeng Fan *Institute of Cotton Research of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences / Research Base, National Key Laboratory of Cotton Bio-Breeding and Integrated Utilization, Anyang Institute of Technology, Henan, 455000, China.
Fanjia Peng *Hunan Institute of Cotton Science, Hunan, 415101, China.
Ruifeng Cui *Institute of Cotton Research of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences / Research Base, National Key Laboratory of Cotton Bio-Breeding and Integrated Utilization, Anyang Institute of Technology, Henan, 455000, China.
Shuai Wang *Institute of Cotton Research of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences / Research Base, National Key Laboratory of Cotton Bio-Breeding and Integrated Utilization, Anyang Institute of Technology, Henan, 455000, China.
Yupeng Cui *Institute of Cotton Research of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences / Research Base, National Key Laboratory of Cotton Bio-Breeding and Integrated Utilization, Anyang Institute of Technology, Henan, 455000, China.
Xuke LuInstitute of Cotton Research of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences / Research Base, National Key Laboratory of Cotton Bio-Breeding and Integrated Utilization, Anyang Institute of Technology, Henan, 455000, China.
Hui HuangInstitute of Cotton Research of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences / Research Base, National Key Laboratory of Cotton Bio-Breeding and Integrated Utilization, Anyang Institute of Technology, Henan, 455000, China.
Kesong NiInstitute of Cotton Research of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences / Research Base, National Key Laboratory of Cotton Bio-Breeding and Integrated Utilization, Anyang Institute of Technology, Henan, 455000, China.
Xiaoyu LiuInstitute of Cotton Research of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences / Research Base, National Key Laboratory of Cotton Bio-Breeding and Integrated Utilization, Anyang Institute of Technology, Henan, 455000, China.
Tiantian JiangInstitute of Cotton Research of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences / Research Base, National Key Laboratory of Cotton Bio-Breeding and Integrated Utilization, Anyang Institute of Technology, Henan, 455000, China.
Xixian FengInstitute of Cotton Research of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences / Research Base, National Key Laboratory of Cotton Bio-Breeding and Integrated Utilization, Anyang Institute of Technology, Henan, 455000, China.
Mengyue LiuInstitute of Cotton Research of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences / Research Base, National Key Laboratory of Cotton Bio-Breeding and Integrated Utilization, Anyang Institute of Technology, Henan, 455000, China.
Yuqian LeiInstitute of Cotton Research of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences / Research Base, National Key Laboratory of Cotton Bio-Breeding and Integrated Utilization, Anyang Institute of Technology, Henan, 455000, China.
Wenhua ChenInstitute of Cotton Research of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences / Research Base, National Key Laboratory of Cotton Bio-Breeding and Integrated Utilization, Anyang Institute of Technology, Henan, 455000, China.
Yuan MengInstitute of Cotton Research of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences / Research Base, National Key Laboratory of Cotton Bio-Breeding and Integrated Utilization, Anyang Institute of Technology, Henan, 455000, China.
Mingge HanInstitute of Cotton Research of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences / Research Base, National Key Laboratory of Cotton Bio-Breeding and Integrated Utilization, Anyang Institute of Technology, Henan, 455000, China.
Delong WangInstitute of Cotton Research of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences / Research Base, National Key Laboratory of Cotton Bio-Breeding and Integrated Utilization, Anyang Institute of Technology, Henan, 455000, China.
Zujun YinInstitute of Cotton Research of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences / Research Base, National Key Laboratory of Cotton Bio-Breeding and Integrated Utilization, Anyang Institute of Technology, Henan, 455000, China.
Xiugui ChenInstitute of Cotton Research of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences / Research Base, National Key Laboratory of Cotton Bio-Breeding and Integrated Utilization, Anyang Institute of Technology, Henan, 455000, China.
Junjuan WangInstitute of Cotton Research of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences / Research Base, National Key Laboratory of Cotton Bio-Breeding and Integrated Utilization, Anyang Institute of Technology, Henan, 455000, China.
Yujun LiHunan Institute of Cotton Science, Hunan, 415101, China.
Lixue GuoInstitute of Cotton Research of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences / Research Base, National Key Laboratory of Cotton Bio-Breeding and Integrated Utilization, Anyang Institute of Technology, Henan, 455000, China.
Lanjie ZhaoInstitute of Cotton Research of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences / Research Base, National Key Laboratory of Cotton Bio-Breeding and Integrated Utilization, Anyang Institute of Technology, Henan, 455000, China.
Wuwei YeInstitute of Cotton Research of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences / Research Base, National Key Laboratory of Cotton Bio-Breeding and Integrated Utilization, Anyang Institute of Technology, Henan, 455000, China. yew158@163.com.
Anyang Institute of Technology · CNChinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CN

Funding

China Agriculture Research System of MOF and MARA CARS-15-41
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInositol monophosphates (IMP) are key enzymes in the ascorbic acid (AsA) synthesis pathways, which play vital roles in regulating plant growth and development and stresses tolerance. To date, no comprehensive analysis of the expression profile of IMP genes and their functions under abiotic stress in cotton has been reported.

resultsIn this study, the genetic characteristics, phylogenetic evolution, cis-acting elements and expression patterns of IMP gene family in cotton were systematically analyzed. A total of 28, 27, 13 and 13 IMP genes were identified in Gossypium hirsutum (G. hirsutum), Gossypium barbadense (G. barbadense), Gossypium arboreum (G. arboreum), and Gossypium raimondii (G. raimondii), respectively. Phylogenetic analysis showed that IMP family genes could cluster into 3 clades. Structure analysis of genes showed that GhIMP genes from the same subgroup had similar genetic structure and exon number. And most GhIMP family members contained hormone-related elements (abscisic acid response element, MeJA response element, gibberellin response element) and stress-related elements (low temperature response element, defense and stress response element, wound response element). After exogenous application of abscisic acid (ABA), some GhIMP genes containing ABA response elements positively responded to alkaline stress, indicating that ABA response elements played an important role in response to alkaline stress. qRT-PCR showed that most of GhIMP genes responded positively to alkaline stress, and GhIMP10D significantly upregulated under alkaline stress, with the highest up-regulated expression level. Virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) experiment showed that compared with 156 plants, MDA content of pYL156:GhIMP10D plants increased significantly, while POD, SOD, chlorophyII and AsA content decreased significantly.

conclusionsThis study provides a thorough overview of the IMP gene family and presents a new perspective on the evolution of this gene family. In particular, some IMP genes may be involved in alkaline stress tolerance regulation, and GhIMP10D showed high expression levels in leaves, stems and roots under alkaline stress, and preliminary functional verification of GhIMP10D gene suggested that it may regulate tolerance to alkaline stress by regulating the activity of antioxidant enzymes and the content of AsA. This study contributes to the subsequent broader discussion of the structure and alkaline resistance of IMP genes in cotton.

Indexed as

AntioxidantsAscorbic AcidAbscisic AcidGossypiumInositolPhylogenyAbscisic AcidAntioxidantsAscorbic AcidInositolAlkaline toleranceAscorbic acidGossypium hirsutum L.Inositol monophosphates

Identifiers

PMID37736713
PMCPMC10515029
OpenAlexW4386944819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.