ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2023
Structural Musculotendinous Parameters That Predict Failed Tendon Healing After Rotator Cuff Repair.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02123784 (Biomarkers for the Surgical Treatment of Rotator Cuff Tears), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Biomarkers for the Surgical Treatment of Rotator Cuff Tears
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic Factors for Repair Integrity After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Review
- Factors Affecting Late-Period Retear That Occurs More than 2 Years After Rotator Cuff Repair.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2025Article
- Double-row suture-bridge technique does not yield better clinical and radiological results than single-row technique in patients older than 55 years at 2 years minimum follow-up: A comparative study.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
- Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerases-Inhibitor Talazoparib Inhibits Muscle Atrophy and Fatty Infiltration in a Tendon Release Infraspinatus Sheep Model: A Pilot Study.Metabolites · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Healing of the rotator cuff after repair constitutes a major clinical challenge with reported high failure rates. Identifying structural musculotendinous predictors for failed rotator cuff repair could enable improved diagnosis and management of patients with rotator cuff disease. Purpose: To investigate structural predictors of the musculotendinous unit for failed tendon healing after rotator cuff repair. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Included were 116 shoulders of 115 consecutive patients with supraspinatus (SSP) tear documented on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) who were treated with an arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Preoperative assessment included standardized clinical and imaging (MRI) examinations. Intraoperatively, biopsies of the joint capsule, the SSP tendon, and muscle were harvested for histological assessment. At 3 and 12 months postoperatively, patients were re-examined clinically and with MRI. Structural and clinical predictors of healing were evaluated using logistic and linear regression models. Results: Structural failure of tendon repair, which was significantly associated with poorer clinical outcome, was associated with older age (β = 1.12; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.26; Conclusion: Both decreased tendon length and increased hybrid muscle fiber type were independent predictors for retear. Clinical outcome was compromised by tendon retearing and increased fatty infiltration of the infraspinatus muscle. A high content of fast MHC-II SSP muscle fibers was associated with a better clinical outcome. Registration: NCT02123784 (ClinicalTrials.govidentifier).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.