Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37736419›Full record

ArticleApplied biosafety : journal of the American Biological Safety Association2023

Environmental Health and Safety Offers a Biosafety Risk Assessment for a Theoretical Model of a Gene Therapy Process Transfer from Research and Development to Large-Scale Manufacturing.

Simon Godwin, Shana Elkind, Timmy Carey, Kimberly DiGiandomenico, Alexa Balbo, Jemma Blocksidge, Jessica Olson, Jess Miklosko, Leo Njongmeta, Francine Preston and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied biosafety : journal of the American Biological Safety Association, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Simon GodwinSanofi, Framingham, Massachusetts, USA.
Shana ElkindRocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cranbury, New Jersey, USA.
Timmy CareyBioMarin Pharmaceutical, Inc., Novato, California, USA.
Kimberly DiGiandomenicoAstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA.
Alexa BalboUltragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc., Novato, California, USA.
Jemma BlocksidgePharmaron, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Jessica OlsonProcess Research & Development, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, New Jersey, USA.
Jess MikloskoUltrgenyx, Bedford, Massachusetts, USA.
Leo NjongmetaAbbVie, Inc., North Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Francine PrestonJohnson & Johnson Services, Inc., Spring House, Pennsylvania, USA.
Rachel HodgesBioPhorum Operations Group Ltd., London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This article provides a strategy by which a manufacturing process with a Biosafety Level 2 (BL2) designation can be downgraded to Biosafety Level 1 (BL1). The principles of the downgrading process are based on the robust contamination controls in clinical and commercial manufacturing, which typically are not part of Research and Development processes. These strict requirements along with the application of current Good Manufacturing Practice (cGMP) principles provide a framework by which processes can be suitably managed and controlled to mitigate biohazard risk, specifically for cell lines that may be contaminated with human pathogenic viral agents. Purpose: We demonstrate how a risk assessment guide was used to define the risk profile of a theoretical process with a human cell line intended for clinical/commercial application. Based on the risk assessment, key BL2 elements were identified as suitable for downgrading, including facility containment controls, emergency spill response plans, and storage and shipping requirements. For various reasons, some aspects of the systems were deemed unsuitable for downgrading due to the severity of the control risk and, therefore, remained at BL2. Summary and Conclusions: We have used an established risk assessment guide to show how cGMP compliments and augments biosafety containment. We provide justification for downgrading from BL2 to BL1 for clinical and commercial cell and gene therapy manufacturing with human cell lines.

Indexed as

biosafetycell and gene therapycommercial manufacturingEnvironmental Health and Safetylarge-scalerisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID37736419
PMCPMC10510678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.