Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37736206›Full record

ReviewAsiaIntervention2023

Obstructive sleep apnoea and coronary revascularisation outcomes.

Adrienne Yh Chew, Chi-Hang Lee

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in AsiaIntervention, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Adrienne Yh ChewYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Chi-Hang LeeDepartment of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
National University of Singapore · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is a chronic sleep disorder characterised by recurrent cyclical episodes of upper airway collapse causing apnoea or hypopnoea. Despite being highly prevalent in patients with cardiovascular conditions, OSA has been a neglected component in cardiovascular practice. Fortunately, in the past few decades, increasing acknowledgement of the vulnerability of cardiac patients to OSA-related stressors and its adverse cardiovascular outcomes has made it a recognised cardiovascular risk factor in practice guidelines. Consequences of OSA include oxidative stress, endothelial dysfunction, autonomic dysfunction, and increased catecholamine release. The perturbations caused by OSA not only provide a clear mechanistic link to cardiovascular disease but also to poor outcomes after coronary revascularisation. This review article focuses on the correlation of OSA to coronary revascularisation outcomes. Our team reported that OSA is present in approximately 50% of patients undergoing coronary revascularisation. Importantly, untreated OSA was found to be an independent predictor of adverse events after both percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting. Although randomised trials did not confirm the benefits of OSA treatment in improving cardiovascular outcomes, these early trials were limited by poor treatment adherence. For now, systematic screening for OSA in patients undergoing coronary revascularisation is not indicated. Yet, with the proven benefit of OSA treatment in improving blood pressure control and quality of life, screening for and treatment of OSA is still indicated if patients have reported excessive daytime sleepiness and/or suboptimally controlled hypertension.

Identifiers

PMID37736206
PMCPMC10507609
OpenAlexW4386866319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.