ArticleNeurology. Clinical practice2023
The Yield of Ambulatory Video-EEG: Predictors of Successful Event Capture.
Article in Neurology. Clinical practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Erratum: Missing Full Disclosures.Neurology. Clinical practice · 2025Article
- Home-Based sensing of the nervous system with clinical neurophysiology technologies: IFCN handbook chapter.Clinical neurophysiology practice · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess the likelihood of capturing a patient's typical event in question on ambulatory video-EEG monitoring (AVEM) based on certain baseline patient or event characteristics. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 300 studies that resulted between June 2021 and August 2022 ordered by adult epileptologists. Patients were included in event analysis if the study was ordered for the purpose of capturing an event (and excluded for all other purposes). Results: A total of 149 studies were included in event analysis. Sixty-eight patients (46%) had their typical events captured on AVEM. Diagnosis was an epileptic seizure in 17 patients (25%), psychogenic nonepileptic seizure in 7 (10%), and other nonepileptic events in 44 (65%). Regarding event frequency, for patients who on average had daily events, 84% had events captured, which corresponds to a significantly increased odds ratio (OR 17.90, 95% CI 7.55-42.44, Discussion: Certain baseline characteristics can increase or decrease the pretest probability of capturing a typical event on AVEM, particularly the frequency of events and number of ASMs. This can be useful information for clinicians before ordering a study so that resources can be properly allocated.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.