Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37736059›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2023

Validation of the Farsi version of the Suicide Ideation and Behavior Scale.

Ali Mehrabi, Azam Naghavi, Mohammad Ershad Afsharzada, Sören Friedrich, Thomas Forkmann, Heide Glaesmer, Tobias Teismann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ali MehrabiDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Education and Psychology, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.
Azam NaghaviDepartment of Counseling, Faculty of Education and Psychology, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.
Mohammad Ershad AfsharzadaDepartment of Counseling, Faculty of Education and Psychology, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.
Sören FriedrichDepartment of Psychology, Mental Health Research and Treatment Center, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Thomas ForkmannDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany.
Heide GlaesmerDepartment of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Tobias TeismannDepartment of Psychology, Mental Health Research and Treatment Center, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Suicide ideation and suicide attempts are prevalent in Farsi speaking populations. The present study aimed at validating the Farsi version of the Suicide Ideation and Behavior Scale (SIBS). Methods: Reliability and validity of the Farsi version of the SIBS were established in a highly burdened Afghan student sample ( Results: The Farsi version of the SIBS was shown to have a unidimensional structure with excellent internal consistency, as well as good convergent and divergent validity. Discussion: The results suggest that the SIBS is a brief, reliable, and valid measure of current suicidal ideation and behavior that can be used in Farsi speaking populations.

Indexed as

Afghanistanassessmentsuicide attemptssuicide ideationvalidation study

Identifiers

PMID37736059
PMCPMC10509848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.