Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37735925›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2023

The diagnostic likelihood ratio function and modified test for trend: Identifying, evaluating, and validating nontraditional biomarkers in case-control studies.

Hanna Lindner, Phyllis A Gimotty, Warren B Bilker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hanna LindnerDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4769-6490
Phyllis A GimottyDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Warren B BilkerDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2704-7525

Funding

Mental Health Biostatistics Training ProgramT32MH065218 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BILKER, WARREN B. · 2003 to 2018
$1.3M
NIMH NIH HHS 5-T32-MH-065218-15NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH065218
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ROC curve and its associated summary statistic, the AUC, are used to identify informative diagnostic biomarkers under the assumption that risk of disease is a monotone function of the biomarker. We refer to biomarkers that meet this assumption as traditional, and those that do not as nontraditional. Nontraditional biomarkers most often arise when both low and high biomarker values are associated with an outcome of interest, such as blood pressure with medical complications or leukocyte count with ICU prognosis. Since nontraditional biomarkers do not meet the assumptions for ROC-based analyses, we propose using the discrete diagnostic likelihood ratio (DLR) function to evaluate a wider class of informative biomarkers. We obtain the DLR function using the multinomial logistic regression (MLR) model to improve upon existing estimation techniques, and implement a likelihood ratio test to identify candidate informative traditional and nontraditional biomarkers. We propose a modification of the Cochran-Armitage test for trend that separates biomarkers deemed informative into traditional and nontraditional categories. The statistical properties of the likelihood ratio test and modified test for trend are explored under simulation. Together, these methods achieve the identification, evaluation, and validation of biomarkers from early discovery research. Finally, we show that incorporating covariates into the MLR model results in a covariate-adjusted DLR function that is useful for integrating multiple sources of information in clinical decision making. The methods are applied to gene expression data from subjects with high grade serous ovarian cancer, where stage, early stage vs late stage, is the outcome of interest.

Indexed as

BiomarkersClinical Decision-MakingBlood PressureCase-Control StudiesHumansLikelihood FunctionsROC CurveBiomarkersclinical decision makingdiagnostic biomarkersdiagnostic likelihood ratiomultinomial regressionROC curvetest for trend

Identifiers

PMID37735925
PMCPMC11073617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.