Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37735884›Full record

Observational studyJournal of intensive care medicine2024

Difficult Intravascular Access in Pediatric Emergency Department: The Ultrasound-Assisted Strategy (DIAPEDUS Study).

Matteo D'Alessandro, Margherita Ricci, Tommaso Bellini, Benedetta Chianucci, Maria Grazia Calevo, Emanuela Piccotti, Andrea Moscatelli

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of intensive care medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Matteo D'AlessandroPediatric Emergency Room and Emergency Medicine, Emergency Department, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0301-5753
Margherita RicciPediatric and Neonatology Unit, San Paolo Hospital (Savona), IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy.
Tommaso BelliniPediatric Emergency Room and Emergency Medicine, Emergency Department, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy.
Benedetta ChianucciPediatric Emergency Room and Emergency Medicine, Emergency Department, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy.
Maria Grazia CalevoEpidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, Scientific Directorate IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy.
Emanuela PiccottiPediatric Emergency Room and Emergency Medicine, Emergency Department, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy.
Andrea MoscatelliNeonatal and Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Emergency Department, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy.
Istituto Giannina Gaslini · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vein line positioning represents one of the first diagnostic and therapeutic steps in Pediatric Emergency Department (PED); however, the outcome of this maneuver is frequently not as expected, especially for difficult-to-access (DIVA) patients. The standard technique (visual-palpatory) has a low success rate; hence ultrasound (US) assistance has been suggested for DIVA patients, although controversial results have been obtained. Our study compared the success rate of an intravascular (IV) access procedure at the first attempt, with and without ultrasound assistance, in pediatric DIVA patients. Secondary objectives were the global success rate, the mean procedural time, the IV device's life span, and the complications rate. We conducted an observational, prospective, monocentric, no-profit cohort study enrolling 110 patients presenting to our ED, aged 0-21 years. All the patients were considered difficult-to-access patients according to the DIVA score (≥4) or history of previous difficult intravascular access. They were randomized into two homogeneous groups: 50 patients with the standard and 60 with the US-assisted technique. We obtained a significantly higher success rate at first attempt with the US-guided technique (90% vs 18%,

Indexed as

Catheterization, PeripheralUltrasonography, InterventionalAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesEmergency Service, HospitalHumansInfantInfant, NewbornProspective StudiesYoung Adultemergency departmentpediatricsperipheral venous accessultrasound

Identifiers

PMID37735884
PMCPMC10845837
OpenAlexW4386945291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.