Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37735883›Full record

ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2023

Chemical Protein Unfolding - A Simple Cooperative Model.

Joachim Seelig, Anna Seelig

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joachim SeeligBiozentrum, University of Basel, Spitalstrasse 41, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-8564-104X
Anna SeeligBiozentrum, University of Basel, Spitalstrasse 41, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-3509-2569
University of Basel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemical unfolding with guanidineHCl or urea is a common method to study the conformational stability of proteins. The analysis of unfolding isotherms is usually performed with an empirical linear extrapolation method (LEM). A large positive free energy is assigned to the native protein, which is usually considered to be a minimum of the free energy. The method thus contradicts common expectations. Here, we present a multistate cooperative model that addresses specifically the binding of the denaturant to the protein and the cooperativity of the protein unfolding equilibrium. The model is based on a molecular statistical-mechanical partition function of the ensemble, but simple solutions for the calculation of the binding isotherm and the associated free energy are presented. The model is applied to 23 published unfolding isotherms of small and large proteins. For a given denaturant, the binding constant depends on temperature and pH but shows little protein specificity. Chemical unfolding is less cooperative than thermal unfolding. The cooperativity parameter σ is at least 2 orders of magnitude larger than that of thermal unfolding. The multistate cooperative model predicts zero free energy for the native protein, which becomes strongly negative beyond the midpoint concentration of unfolding. The free energy to unfold a cooperative unit corresponds exactly to the diffusive energy of the denaturant concentration gradient necessary for unfolding. The temperature dependence of unfolding isotherms yields the denaturant-induced unfolding entropy and, in turn, the unfolding enthalpy. The multistate cooperative model provides molecular insight and is as simple to apply as the LEM but avoids the conceptual difficulties of the latter.

Indexed as

ProteinsProtein UnfoldingGuanidineHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationModels, MolecularProtein DenaturationTemperatureThermodynamicsUreaGuanidineProteinsUrea

Identifiers

PMID37735883
PMCPMC10561279
OpenAlexW4386944556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.