ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2023
SelANet: decision-assisting selective sleep apnea detection based on confidence score.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence for sleep-disordered breathing: a taxonomy of methods, data modalities, and clinical applications.Frontiers in sleep · 2026Review
- Detection and Severity Classification of Sleep Apnea Using Continuous Wearable SpOSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- AI-driven sleep apnea screening with overnight blood oxygen saturation: current practices and future directions.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Review
- Non-Invasive Biosensing for Healthcare Using Artificial Intelligence: A Semi-Systematic Review.Biosensors · 2024Review
- InsightSleepNet: the interpretable and uncertainty-aware deep learning network for sleep staging using continuous Photoplethysmography.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOne of the most common sleep disorders is sleep apnea syndrome. To diagnose sleep apnea syndrome, polysomnography is typically used, but it has limitations in terms of labor, cost, and time. Therefore, studies have been conducted to develop automated detection algorithms using limited biological signals that can be more easily diagnosed. However, the lack of information from limited signals can result in uncertainty from artificial intelligence judgments. Therefore, we performed selective prediction by using estimated respiratory signals from electrocardiogram and oxygen saturation signals based on confidence scores to classify only those sleep apnea occurrence samples with high confidence. In addition, for samples with high uncertainty, this algorithm rejected them, providing a second opinion to the clinician.
methodOur developed model utilized polysomnography data from 994 subjects obtained from Massachusetts General Hospital. We performed feature extraction from the latent vector using the autoencoder. Then, one dimensional convolutional neural network-long short-term memory (1D CNN-LSTM) was designed and trained to measure confidence scores for input, with an additional selection function. We set a confidence score threshold called the target coverage and performed optimization only on samples with confidence scores higher than the target coverage. As a result, we demonstrated that the empirical coverage trained in the model converged to the target coverage.
resultTo confirm whether the model has been optimized according to the objectives, the coverage violation was used to measure the difference between the target coverage and the empirical coverage. As a result, the value of coverage violation was found to be an average of 0.067. Based on the model, we evaluated the classification performance of sleep apnea and confirmed that it achieved 90.26% accuracy, 91.29% sensitivity, and 89.21% specificity. This represents an improvement of approximately 7.03% in all metrics compared to the performance achieved without using a selective prediction.
conclusionThis algorithm based on selective prediction utilizes confidence measurement method to minimize the problem caused by limited biological information. Based on this approach, this algorithm is applicable to wearable devices despite low signal quality and can be used as a simple detection method that determine the need for polysomnography or complement it.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.