Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37735598›Full record

ArticleNature cell biology2023

Myc-dependent dedifferentiation of Gata6

Miguel Bernabé-Rubio, Shahnawaz Ali, Priyanka G Bhosale, Georgina Goss, Seyedeh Atefeh Mobasseri, Rafael Tapia-Rojo, Tong Zhu, Toru Hiratsuka, Matteo Battilocchi, Inês M Tomás and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature cell biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Rewinding the clock: mechanisms of dedifferentiation.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Caspase-8-dependent autophagy regulates neutrophil infiltration in oral squamous cell carcinoma.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Manipulating Myc for reparative regeneration.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Miguel Bernabé-RubioCentre for Gene Therapy and Regenerative Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
Shahnawaz AliCentre for Gene Therapy and Regenerative Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7601-4762
Priyanka G BhosaleCentre for Gene Therapy and Regenerative Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
Georgina GossCentre for Gene Therapy and Regenerative Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
Seyedeh Atefeh MobasseriCentre for Gene Therapy and Regenerative Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
Rafael Tapia-RojoDepartment of Physics, Randall Centre for Cell and Molecular Biophysics, Centre for the Physical Science of Life and London Centre for Nanotechnology, King's College London, London, UK.
Tong ZhuDepartment of Physics, Randall Centre for Cell and Molecular Biophysics, Centre for the Physical Science of Life and London Centre for Nanotechnology, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1804-2124
Toru HiratsukaCentre for Gene Therapy and Regenerative Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
Matteo BattilocchiCentre for Gene Therapy and Regenerative Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
Inês M TomásCentre for Gene Therapy and Regenerative Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
Clarisse GanierCentre for Gene Therapy and Regenerative Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
Sergi Garcia-ManyesDepartment of Physics, Randall Centre for Cell and Molecular Biophysics, Centre for the Physical Science of Life and London Centre for Nanotechnology, King's College London, London, UK.
Fiona M WattCentre for Gene Therapy and Regenerative Medicine, King's College London, London, UK. fiona.watt@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-9151-5154
King's College London · GBEuropean Molecular Biology Organization · DE

Funding

Medical Research Council G1100073Wellcome Trust CC0102
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dedifferentiation is the process by which terminally differentiated cells acquire the properties of stem cells. During mouse skin wound healing, the differentiated Gata6-lineage positive cells of the sebaceous duct are able to dedifferentiate. Here we have integrated lineage tracing and single-cell mRNA sequencing to uncover the underlying mechanism. Gata6-lineage positive and negative epidermal stem cells in wounds are transcriptionally indistinguishable. Furthermore, in contrast to reprogramming of induced pluripotent stem cells, the same genes are expressed in the epidermal dedifferentiation and differentiation trajectories, indicating that dedifferentiation does not involve adoption of a new cell state. We demonstrate that dedifferentiation is not only induced by wounding, but also by retinoic acid treatment or mechanical expansion of the epidermis. In all three cases, dedifferentiation is dependent on the master transcription factor c-Myc. Mechanotransduction and actin-cytoskeleton remodelling are key features of dedifferentiation. Our study elucidates the molecular basis of epidermal dedifferentiation, which may be generally applicable to adult tissues.

Indexed as

Cell DedifferentiationMechanotransduction, CellularAnimalsCell DifferentiationEpidermal CellsEpidermisGATA6 Transcription FactorMiceProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycGata6 protein, mouseGATA6 Transcription FactorMyc protein, mouseProto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc

Identifiers

PMID37735598
PMCPMC10567550
OpenAlexW4386923934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.