Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37735570›Full record

ArticleNature methods2023

Fast and robust metagenomic sequence comparison through sparse chaining with skani.

Jim Shaw, Yun William Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature methods, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 155 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
155citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

155 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Oxytetracycline ProducerInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Genome sequences ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2026
    Article
  11. An integrated genomic framework forMicrobial genomics · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Draft genome sequence ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2026
    Article
  20. High-quality draft genome sequence ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2026
    Article

95 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jim ShawDepartment of Mathematics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. jshaw@math.toronto.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6990-7829
Yun William YuDepartment of Mathematics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. ywyu@cmu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8275-9576

Funding

Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology) RGPIN-2022-03074Gouvernement du Canada | Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (Conseil de Recherches en Sciences Naturelles et en Génie du Canada) CGS-D
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sequence comparison tools for metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) struggle with high-volume or low-quality data. We present skani ( https://github.com/bluenote-1577/skani ), a method for determining average nucleotide identity (ANI) via sparse approximate alignments. skani outperforms FastANI in accuracy and speed (>20× faster) for fragmented, incomplete MAGs. skani can query genomes against >65,000 prokaryotic genomes in seconds and 6 GB memory. skani unlocks higher-resolution insights for extensive, noisy metagenomic datasets.

Indexed as

MetagenomeProkaryotic CellsMetagenomics

Identifiers

PMID37735570
PMCPMC10630134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.