ArticleScientific reports2023
An experimental comparison between primer and nucleotide labelling to produce RPA-amplicons used for multiplex detection of antibiotic resistance genes.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- DNA conjugation on functionalized plastic surfaces for sequential, iterative single molecule sequencing.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Direct TAMRA-dUTP labeling of M. tuberculosis genes using loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP).Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Comparison of pre-labelled primers and nucleotides as DNA labelling method for lateral flow detection of Legionella pneumophila amplicons.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Direct labelling of amplification products using isothermal amplification is currently done most frequently by incorporating previously labelled primer. Although this method is well proven and widely used, it is not a universal solution due to some weaknesses. Alternatively, labelled nucleotides could be used, whose application and functionality have been already partially demonstrated. It remains to be determined how this method performs in comparison to traditional labelling, in particular combined with isothermal amplification methods. In this work, we show a detailed analysis of the labelling efficiency under different conditions and compare the results with the traditional primer-labelling method in the context of RPA amplification. Impressively, our results showed that using Cy5-labelled dUTPs can achieve much more efficient labelling for fragments above 200 bp, while using them for smaller fragments does not bring any relevant disadvantages, but also no major benefit. Furthermore, this work successfully demonstrate for the first time a quadruplex microarray for the detection of resistance genes using RPA and direct labelling with Cy5-dUTP as a potential application scenario. The sensitivities achieved here extend to SNP discovery for the detection of the proper bla
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.