ArticleScientific reports2023
Sustainable colonization of Mars using shape optimized structures and in situ concrete.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A membrane Sabatier system for water recovery and rocket propellant production.Nature communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The major obstacle to Martian colonization is the mission cost which requires significant reduction. From the structural engineering point of view, importing materials and structural elements from Earth or massive excavations on the surface of Mars require an enormous amount of energy; thus, inflatable and under-surface structures as the main options for Martian colonization seem unrealistically expensive. Construction of affordable buildings onsite using only in situ sources may represent an ideal solution for Martian colonization. On the other hand, solar energy, at the early stage of colonization, would be the only available, practical, and low-cost energy source on Mars. Though, for sustainable and broad colonization, the energy required for construction and the construction cost should be minimized. Here, we propose three types of simple (relatively optimized), perforated, and algorithmic shape-optimized Martian structures to minimize the material and energy required for construction as well as the construction cost using only in situ resources. These structural forms can be considered remarkable steps towards sustainable structural construction and colonization on Mars. Also, these innovative structures were designed to minimize the tensile stress (maximize the compressive stress) and enable the use of in situ concrete. Our data indicate that compared to our previous study, the material and energy required for construction as well as the construction cost can be reduced by more than 50%. Acceptance criteria and limitations appropriate to the Martian environment, and desirable structural and material behaviors were defined to evaluate whether or not the behavior of a structure under the applied loads and conditions will be acceptable. To detect potential issues for onsite construction and evaluate the geometry of the models, a 1:200 3D model of the best structural form was printed.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.