ArticleNature communications2023
Causal inference from cross-sectional earth system data with geographical convergent cross mapping.
Article in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in causal discovery methods for ecological time series.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026Review
- Bidirectional yet asymmetric causality between urban systems and traffic dynamics in 30 cities worldwide.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Identifying the causal effects of photovoltaic installations on grassland productivity using double machine learning: a case study in inner Mongolia.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Utilizing Causal Network Markers to Identify Tipping Points ahead of Critical Transition.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Inferring causal trajectories from spatial transcriptomics using CASCAT.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Spatiotemporal Assessment and Driving Factors of Ecosystem Health: A Case Study of Two Provinces in Southern China.Biology · 2025Article
- Analysis of the coupling and coordination between soil erosion and land use in the Northeastern black soil region of China: a case study of Lishu County.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Dual hybrid frameworks combining graph convolutional network with decoding for covering location problem.iScience · 2024Article
- Editorial: Applications of geospatial information technologies and spatial statistics in health services research.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Causal inference in complex systems has been largely promoted by the proposal of some advanced temporal causation models. However, temporal models have serious limitations when time series data are not available or present insignificant variations, which causes a common challenge for earth system science. Meanwhile, there are few spatial causation models for fully exploring the rich spatial cross-sectional data in Earth systems. The generalized embedding theorem proves that observations can be combined together to construct the state space of the dynamic system, and if two variables are from the same dynamic system, they are causally linked. Inspired by this, here we show a Geographical Convergent Cross Mapping (GCCM) model for spatial causal inference with spatial cross-sectional data-based cross-mapping prediction in reconstructed state space. Three typical cases, where clearly existing causations cannot be measured through temporal models, demonstrate that GCCM could detect weak-moderate causations when the correlation is not significant. When the coupling between two variables is significant and strong, GCCM is advantageous in identifying the primary causation direction and better revealing the bidirectional asymmetric causation, overcoming the mirroring effect.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.