Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37735466›Full record

ArticleNature communications2023

Causal inference from cross-sectional earth system data with geographical convergent cross mapping.

Bingbo Gao, Jianyu Yang, Ziyue Chen, George Sugihara, Manchun Li, Alfred Stein, Mei-Po Kwan, Jinfeng Wang

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Advances in causal discovery methods for ecological time series.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Utilizing Causal Network Markers to Identify Tipping Points ahead of Critical Transition.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bingbo Gao *College of Land Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Jianyu Yang *College of Land Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
Ziyue ChenFaculty of Geographical Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China. zychen@bnu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4103-3792
George SugiharaScripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Manchun LiSchool of Geography and Ocean Science, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Alfred SteinFaculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Mei-Po KwanDepartment of Geography and Resource Management, and Institute of Space and Earth Information Science, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8602-9258
Jinfeng WangState Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Information Systems, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Nature Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. wangjf@lreis.ac.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6687-9420

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 41971054National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 41971399National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 42271428
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Causal inference in complex systems has been largely promoted by the proposal of some advanced temporal causation models. However, temporal models have serious limitations when time series data are not available or present insignificant variations, which causes a common challenge for earth system science. Meanwhile, there are few spatial causation models for fully exploring the rich spatial cross-sectional data in Earth systems. The generalized embedding theorem proves that observations can be combined together to construct the state space of the dynamic system, and if two variables are from the same dynamic system, they are causally linked. Inspired by this, here we show a Geographical Convergent Cross Mapping (GCCM) model for spatial causal inference with spatial cross-sectional data-based cross-mapping prediction in reconstructed state space. Three typical cases, where clearly existing causations cannot be measured through temporal models, demonstrate that GCCM could detect weak-moderate causations when the correlation is not significant. When the coupling between two variables is significant and strong, GCCM is advantageous in identifying the primary causation direction and better revealing the bidirectional asymmetric causation, overcoming the mirroring effect.

Identifiers

PMID37735466
PMCPMC10514035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.