Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37735434›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR2023

Different states of stemness of glioblastoma stem cells sustain glioblastoma subtypes indicating novel clinical biomarkers and high-efficacy customized therapies.

Alberto Visioli, Nadia Trivieri, Gandino Mencarelli, Fabrizio Giani, Massimiliano Copetti, Orazio Palumbo, Riccardo Pracella, Maria Grazia Cariglia, Chiara Barile, Luigi Mischitelli and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Biodegradable nanofibrous scaffolds enhance standard of care for glioblastoma via localized targeted therapy.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Alberto Visioli *StemGen SpA, Milan, Italy.
Nadia Trivieri *Cancer Stem Cells Unit, Institute for Stem Cell Biology, Regenerative Medicine and Innovative Therapeutics (ISBReMIT), IRCSS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, Opera di San Pio da Pietrelcina, San Giovanni Rotondo, FG, Italy.
Gandino MencarelliCancer Stem Cells Unit, Institute for Stem Cell Biology, Regenerative Medicine and Innovative Therapeutics (ISBReMIT), IRCSS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, Opera di San Pio da Pietrelcina, San Giovanni Rotondo, FG, Italy.
Fabrizio GianiStemGen SpA, Milan, Italy.
Massimiliano CopettiBiostatistical Unit, IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy.
Orazio PalumboMedical Genetics Unit, IRCCS Casa Sollievo Della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy.
Riccardo PracellaCancer Stem Cells Unit, Institute for Stem Cell Biology, Regenerative Medicine and Innovative Therapeutics (ISBReMIT), IRCSS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, Opera di San Pio da Pietrelcina, San Giovanni Rotondo, FG, Italy.
Maria Grazia CarigliaCancer Stem Cells Unit, Institute for Stem Cell Biology, Regenerative Medicine and Innovative Therapeutics (ISBReMIT), IRCSS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, Opera di San Pio da Pietrelcina, San Giovanni Rotondo, FG, Italy.
Chiara BarileCancer Stem Cells Unit, Institute for Stem Cell Biology, Regenerative Medicine and Innovative Therapeutics (ISBReMIT), IRCSS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, Opera di San Pio da Pietrelcina, San Giovanni Rotondo, FG, Italy.
Luigi MischitelliCancer Stem Cells Unit, Institute for Stem Cell Biology, Regenerative Medicine and Innovative Therapeutics (ISBReMIT), IRCSS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, Opera di San Pio da Pietrelcina, San Giovanni Rotondo, FG, Italy.
Amata Amy SorianoCancer Stem Cells Unit, Institute for Stem Cell Biology, Regenerative Medicine and Innovative Therapeutics (ISBReMIT), IRCSS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, Opera di San Pio da Pietrelcina, San Giovanni Rotondo, FG, Italy.
Pietro PalumboMedical Genetics Unit, IRCCS Casa Sollievo Della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy.
Federico LegnaniDepartment of Neurosurgery, National Neurologic Institute IRCCS C. Besta, Milan, Italy.
Francesco DiMecoDepartment of Neurosurgery, National Neurologic Institute IRCCS C. Besta, Milan, Italy.
Leonardo GorgoglioneNeurosurgery Unit, IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, Milan, Italy.
Graziano PesoleDepartment of Biosciences, Biotechnology and Environment, University of Bari A. Moro, Bari, Italy.
Angelo L VescoviScientific Directorate, IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy. angelo.vescovi@unimib.it.
Elena BindaCancer Stem Cells Unit, Institute for Stem Cell Biology, Regenerative Medicine and Innovative Therapeutics (ISBReMIT), IRCSS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, Opera di San Pio da Pietrelcina, San Giovanni Rotondo, FG, Italy. e.binda@operapadrepio.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8750-2905
Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza · ITInstitute of Biomembranes, Bioenergetics and Molecular Biotechnologies · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro IG-22027Ministero della Salute GR-2011-02351534Ministero della Salute Progetto Ricerca Corrente 2018-20Ministero della Salute Progetto Ricerca Corrente 2020-2023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlioblastoma (GBM) is the most malignant among gliomas with an inevitable lethal outcome. The elucidation of the physiology and regulation of this tumor is mandatory to unravel novel target and effective therapeutics. Emerging concepts show that the minor subset of glioblastoma stem cells (GSCs) accounts for tumorigenicity, representing the true target for innovative therapies in GBM.

methodsHere, we isolated and established functionally stable and steadily expanding GSCs lines from a large cohort of GBM patients. The molecular, functional and antigenic landscape of GBM tissues and their derivative GSCs was highlited in a side-by-side comprehensive genomic and transcriptomic characterization by ANOVA and Fisher's exact tests. GSCs' physio-pathological hallmarks were delineated by comparing over time in vitro and in vivo their expansion, self-renewal and tumorigenic ability with hierarchical linear models for repeated measurements and Kaplan-Meier method. Candidate biomarkers performance in discriminating GBM patients' classification emerged by classification tree and patients' survival analysis.

resultsHere, distinct biomarker signatures together with aberrant functional programs were shown to stratify GBM patients as well as their sibling GSCs population into TCGA clusters. Of importance, GSCs cells were demonstrated to fully resemble over time the molecular features of their patient of origin. Furthermore, we pointed out the existence of distinct GSCs subsets within GBM classification, inherently endowed with different self-renewal and tumorigenic potential. Particularly, classical GSCs were identified by more undifferentiated biological hallmarks, enhanced expansion and clonal capacity as compared to the more mature, relatively slow-propagating mesenchymal and proneural cells, likely endowed with a higher potential for infiltration either ex vivo or in vivo. Importantly, the combination of DCX and EGFR markers, selectively enriched among GSCs pools, almost exactly predicted GBM patients' clusters together with their survival and drug response.

conclusionsIn this study we report that an inherent enrichment of distinct GSCs pools underpin the functional inter-cluster variances displayed by GBM patients. We uncover two selectively represented novel functional biomarkers capable of discriminating GBM patients' stratification, survival and drug response, setting the stage for the determination of patient-tailored diagnostic and prognostic strategies and, mostly, for the design of appropriate, patient-selective treatment protocols.

Indexed as

GlioblastomaGliomaBiomarkersCarcinogenesisHumansStem CellsBiomarkersAnti-GBM patient-tailored strategiesGlioblastomaGlioblastoma stem cells (GSCs)Stemness-related therapeutic biomarkers

Identifiers

PMID37735434
PMCPMC10512479
OpenAlexW4386934530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.