Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37735354›Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2023

Automated cervical cell segmentation using deep ensemble learning.

Jie Ji, Weifeng Zhang, Yuejiao Dong, Ruilin Lin, Yiqun Geng, Liangli Hong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jie Ji *Network & Information Center, Shantou University, Shantou, 515041, Guangdong, China.
Weifeng Zhang *Guangdong Provincial International Collaborative Center of Molecular Medicine, Laboratory of Molecular Pathology, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, 515041, China.
Yuejiao DongDepartment of Pathology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, 515041, Guangdong, China.
Ruilin LinDepartment of Pathology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, 515041, Guangdong, China.
Yiqun GengGuangdong Provincial International Collaborative Center of Molecular Medicine, Laboratory of Molecular Pathology, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, 515041, China. yqgeng@stu.edu.cn.
Liangli HongDepartment of Pathology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, 515041, Guangdong, China. hong_liangli@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCervical cell segmentation is a fundamental step in automated cervical cancer cytology screening. The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a deep ensemble model for cervical cell segmentation including both cytoplasm and nucleus segmentation.

methodsThe Cx22 dataset was used to develop the automated cervical cell segmentation algorithm. The U-Net, U-Net +  + , DeepLabV3, DeepLabV3Plus, Transunet, and Segformer were used as candidate model architectures, and each of the first four architectures adopted two different encoders choosing from resnet34, resnet50 and denseNet121. Models were trained under two settings: trained from scratch, encoders initialized from ImageNet pre-trained models and then all layers were fine-tuned. For every segmentation task, four models were chosen as base models, and Unweighted average was adopted as the model ensemble method.

resultsU-Net and U-Net +  + with resnet34 and denseNet121 encoders trained using transfer learning consistently performed better than other models, so they were chosen as base models. The ensemble model obtained the Dice similarity coefficient, sensitivity, specificity of 0.9535 (95% CI:0.9534-0.9536), 0.9621 (0.9619-0.9622),0.9835 (0.9834-0.9836) and 0.7863 (0.7851-0.7876), 0.9581 (0.9573-0.959), 0.9961 (0.9961-0.9962) on cytoplasm segmentation and nucleus segmentation, respectively. The Dice, sensitivity, specificity of baseline models for cytoplasm segmentation and nucleus segmentation were 0.948, 0.954, 0.9823 and 0.750, 0.713, 0.9988, respectively. Except for the specificity of cytoplasm segmentation, all metrics outperformed the best baseline models (P < 0.05) with a moderate margin.

conclusionsThe proposed algorithm achieved better performances on cervical cell segmentation than baseline models. It can be potentially used in automated cervical cancer cytology screening system.

Indexed as

Uterine Cervical NeoplasmsAlgorithmsFemaleHumansMachine LearningNeckCervical cell segmentationCervical cytology screeningDeep ensemble learningU-NetU-Net +  +

Identifiers

PMID37735354
PMCPMC10514950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.