ArticleBMC medical imaging2023
Automated cervical cell segmentation using deep ensemble learning.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Application of artificial intelligence in cervical cytology: a systematic review of deep learning models, datasets, and reported metrics.Frontiers in big data · 2025Pooled it
- UCTLFANet: a low-rank fine-tuning model for microalgae image segmentation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Deep learning for automated mandibular canal segmentation in CBCT scans.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Progress in the application research of cervical cancer screening developed by artificial intelligence in large populations.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- Machine and Deep Learning for the Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Treatment of Cervical Cancer: A Scoping Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Force Map-Enhanced Segmentation of a Lightweight Model for the Early Detection of Cervical Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence strengthens cervical cancer screening - present and future.Cancer biology & medicine · 2024Review
- Diagnosis model of early Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia based on convolutional neural network: a comparison with traditional PCR diagnostic method.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCervical cell segmentation is a fundamental step in automated cervical cancer cytology screening. The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a deep ensemble model for cervical cell segmentation including both cytoplasm and nucleus segmentation.
methodsThe Cx22 dataset was used to develop the automated cervical cell segmentation algorithm. The U-Net, U-Net + + , DeepLabV3, DeepLabV3Plus, Transunet, and Segformer were used as candidate model architectures, and each of the first four architectures adopted two different encoders choosing from resnet34, resnet50 and denseNet121. Models were trained under two settings: trained from scratch, encoders initialized from ImageNet pre-trained models and then all layers were fine-tuned. For every segmentation task, four models were chosen as base models, and Unweighted average was adopted as the model ensemble method.
resultsU-Net and U-Net + + with resnet34 and denseNet121 encoders trained using transfer learning consistently performed better than other models, so they were chosen as base models. The ensemble model obtained the Dice similarity coefficient, sensitivity, specificity of 0.9535 (95% CI:0.9534-0.9536), 0.9621 (0.9619-0.9622),0.9835 (0.9834-0.9836) and 0.7863 (0.7851-0.7876), 0.9581 (0.9573-0.959), 0.9961 (0.9961-0.9962) on cytoplasm segmentation and nucleus segmentation, respectively. The Dice, sensitivity, specificity of baseline models for cytoplasm segmentation and nucleus segmentation were 0.948, 0.954, 0.9823 and 0.750, 0.713, 0.9988, respectively. Except for the specificity of cytoplasm segmentation, all metrics outperformed the best baseline models (P < 0.05) with a moderate margin.
conclusionsThe proposed algorithm achieved better performances on cervical cell segmentation than baseline models. It can be potentially used in automated cervical cancer cytology screening system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.