Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37735308›Full record

ReviewJournal of digital imaging2023

Public Imaging Datasets of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy for Artificial Intelligence: a Review.

Shiqi Zhu, Jingwen Gao, Lu Liu, Minyue Yin, Jiaxi Lin, Chang Xu, Chunfang Xu, Jinzhou Zhu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of digital imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Hallucination-Aware Multimodal Benchmark for Gastrointestinal Image Analysis with Large Vision-Language Models.Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shiqi ZhuDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, 188 Shizi Street, Suzhou , Jiangsu, 215000, China.
Jingwen GaoDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, 188 Shizi Street, Suzhou , Jiangsu, 215000, China.
Lu LiuDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, 188 Shizi Street, Suzhou , Jiangsu, 215000, China.
Minyue YinDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, 188 Shizi Street, Suzhou , Jiangsu, 215000, China.
Jiaxi LinDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, 188 Shizi Street, Suzhou , Jiangsu, 215000, China.
Chang XuDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, 188 Shizi Street, Suzhou , Jiangsu, 215000, China.
Chunfang XuDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, 188 Shizi Street, Suzhou , Jiangsu, 215000, China. xuchunfang@suda.edu.cn.
Jinzhou ZhuDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, 188 Shizi Street, Suzhou , Jiangsu, 215000, China. jzzhu@zju.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0544-9248

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the advances in endoscopic technologies and artificial intelligence, a large number of endoscopic imaging datasets have been made public to researchers around the world. This study aims to review and introduce these datasets. An extensive literature search was conducted to identify appropriate datasets in PubMed, and other targeted searches were conducted in GitHub, Kaggle, and Simula to identify datasets directly. We provided a brief introduction to each dataset and evaluated the characteristics of the datasets included. Moreover, two national datasets in progress were discussed. A total of 40 datasets of endoscopic images were included, of which 34 were accessible for use. Basic and detailed information on each dataset was reported. Of all the datasets, 16 focus on polyps, and 6 focus on small bowel lesions. Most datasets (n = 16) were constructed by colonoscopy only, followed by normal gastrointestinal endoscopy and capsule endoscopy (n = 9). This review may facilitate the usage of public dataset resources in endoscopic research.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCapsule EndoscopyColonoscopyDiagnostic ImagingHumansIntestine, SmallArtificial intelligenceDatasetsEndoscopyReview

Identifiers

PMID37735308
PMCPMC10584770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.