ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2024
Classification of breast lesions in ultrasound images using deep convolutional neural networks: transfer learning versus automatic architecture design.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Favoring flat minima improves generalization of transfer-learned models for breast ultrasound tumor classification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- An Interpretable Ensemble Transformer Framework for Breast Cancer Detection in Ultrasound Images.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A Dirichlet Distribution-Based Complex Ensemble Approach for Breast Cancer Classification from Ultrasound Images with Transfer Learning and Multiphase Spaced Repetition Method.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in breast surgery: Current applications, challenges, and future perspectives.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Review
- Ultrasound-based artificial intelligence for breast lesion classification.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Efficient temporal feature utilization in ultrasound videos: a multi-channel deep learning framework for enhanced breast lesion differentiation.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- A Review of Artificial Intelligence in Breast Imaging.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2024Review
- Explainable DCNN Decision Framework for Breast Lesion Classification from Ultrasound Images Based on Cancer Characteristics.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Exploring the use of deep learning models for accurate tracking of 3D zebrafish trajectories.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
- A multi-patch-based deep learning model with VGG19 for breast cancer classifications in the pathology images.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deep convolutional neural networks (DCNNs) have demonstrated promising performance in classifying breast lesions in 2D ultrasound (US) images. Exiting approaches typically use pre-trained models based on architectures designed for natural images with transfer learning. Fewer attempts have been made to design customized architectures specifically for this purpose. This paper presents a comprehensive evaluation on transfer learning based solutions and automatically designed networks, analyzing the accuracy and robustness of different recognition models in three folds. First, we develop six different DCNN models (BNet, GNet, SqNet, DsNet, RsNet, IncReNet) based on transfer learning. Second, we adapt the Bayesian optimization method to optimize a CNN network (BONet) for classifying breast lesions. A retrospective dataset of 3034 US images collected from various hospitals is then used for evaluation. Extensive tests show that the BONet outperforms other models, exhibiting higher accuracy (83.33%), lower generalization gap (1.85%), shorter training time (66 min), and less model complexity (approximately 0.5 million weight parameters). We also compare the diagnostic performance of all models against that by three experienced radiologists. Finally, we explore the use of saliency maps to explain the classification decisions made by different models. Our investigation shows that saliency maps can assist in comprehending the classification decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.