Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37735174›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Behavior of non-prismatic RC beams with conventional steel and green GFRP rebars for sustainable infrastructure.

Suniti Suparp, Inamullah Khan, Ali Ejaz, Kaffayatullah Khan, Uruya Weesakul, Qudeer Hussain, Panumas Saingam

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Suniti SuparpDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Srinakharinwirot University, Nakhonnayok, 26120, Thailand.
Inamullah KhanNational Institute of Transportation, National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST), Islamabad, Pakistan.
Ali EjazNational Institute of Transportation, National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST), Islamabad, Pakistan.
Kaffayatullah KhanDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, King Faisal University, P.O. Box 380, 31982, Al-Hofuf, Al-Ahsa, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Uruya WeesakulThammasat University Research Unit in Climate Change and Sustainability, Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Thammasat School of Engineering, Thammasat University, Pathumthani, 12120, Thailand.
Qudeer HussainDr. House Consultants Co. Ltd., Bangkok, Thailand.
Panumas SaingamDepartment of Civil Engineering, School of Engineering, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok, 10520, Thailand. panumas.sa@kmitl.ac.th.
National University of Sciences and Technology · PKKing Faisal University · SAKing Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang · THSrinakharinwirot University · THThammasat University · TH

Funding

Faculty of Engineering, Srinakharinwirot University, Thailand Research Grant ID 301/2565
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study presents an experimental and finite element analysis of reinforced concrete beams with solid, hollow, prismatic, or non-prismatic sections. In the first part, a total of six beams were tested under four-point monotonic bending. The test matrix was designed to provide a comparison of structural behavior between prismatic solid and hollow section beams, prismatic solid and non-prismatic solid section beams, and prismatic hollow and non-prismatic hollow section beams. The intensity of shear was maximum in the case of prismatic section beams. The inclusion of a tapered section lowered the demand for shear. In the second part, Nonlinear Finite Element Modeling was performed by using ATENA. The adopted modeling strategy resulted in close agreement with experimental crack patterns at ultimate failure. However, the ultimate failure loads predicted by nonlinear modeling were generally higher than their corresponding experimental results. Whereas in the last part, the developed models were further extended to investigate the effect of the strength of concrete and ratio of longitudinal steel bars on the ultimate load-carrying capacity and cracking behavior of the reinforced concrete beams with solid, hollow, prismatic, or non-prismatic sections. The ultimate loads for each beam predicted by the model were found to be in close agreement with experimental results. Nonlinear modeling was further extended to assess the effects of concrete strength and longitudinal reinforcement ratio on failure patterns and ultimate loads. The parametric study involved beams reinforced with glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars against shear and flexural failure. In terms of ultimate load capacities, diagonal cracking, and flexural cracking, beams strengthened with GFRP bars demonstrated comparable performance to the beams strengthened with steel bars.

Identifiers

PMID37735174
PMCPMC10514347
OpenAlexW4386925647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.