Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37734896›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Protocolised early de-resuscitation in septic shock (REDUCE): protocol for a randomised controlled multicentre feasibility trial.

Anna Messmer, Urs Pietsch, Martin Siegemund, Philipp Buehler, Jan Waskowski, Martin Müller, Dominik E Uehlinger, Alexa Hollinger, Miodrag Filipovic, David Berger and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04931485 (Protocolised Early De-Resuscitation in Septic Shock), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04931485 nacompletednot on this map

Protocolised Early De-Resuscitation in Septic Shock (REDUCE) - a Randomised Controlled Multi-centre Feasibility Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorInsel Gruppe AG, University Hospital BernRan2021 to 2025Enrolled170ConditionsSeptic ShockArmsFluid management according to the REDUCE Fluid Protocol, Standard of care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Anna MessmerIntensive Care Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern University, Bern, Switzerland anna.messmer@insel.ch.ORCID 0000-0002-3206-9112
Urs PietschDepartment of operative Intensive Care Medicine, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Martin SiegemundIntensive Care Unit, Department of Acute Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2013-4140
Philipp BuehlerDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Cantonal Hospital Winterthu, Winterthur, Switzerland.
Jan WaskowskiIntensive Care Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern University, Bern, Switzerland.
Martin MüllerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern University, Bern, Switzerland.
Dominik E UehlingerDepartment of Nephrology and Hypertension, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern University, Bern, Switzerland.
Alexa HollingerIntensive Care Unit, Department of Acute Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6799-1652
Miodrag FilipovicDepartment of operative Intensive Care Medicine, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
David BergerIntensive Care Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern University, Bern, Switzerland.
Joerg C SchefoldIntensive Care Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern University, Bern, Switzerland.
Carmen A PfortmuellerIntensive Care Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern University, Bern, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFluid overload is associated with excess mortality in septic shock. Current approaches to reduce fluid overload include restrictive administration of fluid or active removal of accumulated fluid. However, evidence on active fluid removal is scarce. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy and feasibility of an early de-resuscitation protocol in patients with septic shock.

methodsAll patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with a septic shock are screened, and eligible patients will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to intervention or standard of care.

interventionFluid management will be performed according to the REDUCE protocol, where resuscitation fluid will be restricted to patients showing signs of poor tissue perfusion. After the lactate has peaked, the patient is deemed stable and assessed for active de-resuscitation (signs of fluid overload). The primary objective of this study is the proportion of patients with a negative cumulative fluid balance at day 3 after ICU. Secondary objectives are cumulative fluid balances throughout the ICU stay, number of patients with fluid overload, feasibility and safety outcomes and patient-centred outcomes. The primary outcome will be assessed by a logistic regression model adjusting for the stratification variables (trial site and chronic renal failure) in the intention-to-treat population. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the respective ethical committees (No 2020-02197). The results of the REDUCE trial will be published in an international peer-reviewed medical journal regardless of the results. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04931485.

Indexed as

Kidney Failure, ChronicShock, SepticFeasibility StudiesHumansLactic AcidMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResuscitationLactic AcidAdult intensive & critical careDialysisINTENSIVE & CRITICAL CARE

Identifiers

PMID37734896
PMCPMC11148668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.