ReviewCanadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie
Colorectal polyp classification and management of complex polyps for surgeon endoscopists.
Review in Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- PillCam COLON 2 for investigation of the colon through direct visualisation: systematic review and economic evaluation.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2026Pooled it
- T1 colorectal cancer: determinants of lymph node metastasis, survival patterns, and risk-adapted management.Updates in surgery · 2026Review
- Microrobotic copper-rich electrochemical interfacing for targeted cancer theranostics in the gut.Science advances · 2026Article
- A Bionic Multichannel Whisker System for Assisting Endoluminal Intervention.Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
- A histopathology aware DINO model with attention based representation enhancement.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Scarred and complex colorectal polyps: Traditional techniques and emerging alternatives.World journal of methodology · 2025Review
- Gut microbiota and intestinal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on 16S rRNA gene sequencing.Gut pathogens · 2025Review
- Bridging the gap: Computer-aided detection and Yamada classification system matches expert performance.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Postoperative recovery and bleeding risk after endoscopic snare cold resection in patients with 5-15 mm colorectal polyps.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- Adenoma and carcinoma in the anal transitional zone following hand-sewn versus stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in familial adenomatous polyposis.Familial cancer · 2025Article
- Adenoma per polypectomy as a training metric in colonoscopy: a retrospective analysis of trainee progression compared to expert performance.Annals of surgical treatment and research · 2025Article
- Enhancing and Not Replacing Clinical Expertise: Improving Named-Entity Recognition in Colonoscopy Reports Through Mixed Real-Synthetic Training Sources.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Article
- Classification of image-enhanced endoscopy in colon tumors.Clinical endoscopy · 2025Review
- Algorithmic approach for endoscopic management of colorectal polyps: an up-to-date review.Gastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench · 2025Review
- Characteristics and risk factor analyses of high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia in older patients with colorectal polyps.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2024Article
- New Approaches Based on Inflammatory Indexes in the Evaluation of the Neoplastic Potential of Colon Polyps.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Increasing familiarity with advanced endoscopic excision techniques allows for more colorectal lesions to be removed without major surgery. Endoscopic excision with negative margins is adequate for most polyps and low-risk T1 cancers. The use of modern polyp classification techniques based on size, morphology and pit pattern by an experienced endoscopist allow for an optical diagnosis of these lesions and can predict, with high accuracy, which lesions contain malignant disease and the level of invasion. A surgeon endoscopist must be able to recognize which complex polyps can be resected with advanced polypectomy techniques and which require upfront surgery. We aimed to provide an overview of polyp classification techniques to help surgeons select the correct treatment algorithm for advanced colorectal lesions based on their visual characteristics at index endoscopy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.