Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37734732›Full record

ArticleJournal of athletic training2024

Preliminary Examination of Guardian Cap Head Impact Kinematics Using Instrumented Mouthguards.

Kristen G Quigley, Dustin Hopfe, Madison Fenner, Philip Pavilionis, Vincentia Owusu-Amankonah, Arthur Islas, Nicholas G Murray

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of athletic training, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Efficacy of Guardian Cap Soft-Shell Padding on Head Impact Kinematics in American Football: Pilot Findings.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kristen G QuigleyNeuromechanics Laboratory, School of Public Health, and.
Dustin HopfeNeuromechanics Laboratory, School of Public Health, and.
Madison FennerNeuromechanics Laboratory, School of Public Health, and.
Philip PavilionisNeuromechanics Laboratory, School of Public Health, and.
Vincentia Owusu-AmankonahNeuromechanics Laboratory, School of Public Health, and.
Arthur IslasSchool of Medicine, University of Nevada, Reno.
Nicholas G MurrayNeuromechanics Laboratory, School of Public Health, and.

Funding

Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality CoreP20GM103650 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO · PI WEBSTER, MICHAEL A · 2012 to 2022
$20.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103650
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextGuardian Caps (GCs) are currently the most popular external helmet add-on designed to reduce the magnitude of head impacts experienced by American football players. Guardian Caps have been endorsed by influential professional organizations; however, few studies evaluating their efficiency are publicly available.

objectiveTo present preliminary on-field head kinematics data for National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I American football players using instrumented mouthguards through closely matched preseason workouts with and without GCs.

designCase series.

settingThe 2022 American football preseason. PATIENTS OR OTHER

participantsTwenty-five male NCAA Division I student-athletes participating in American football completed some portion of the 6 workouts included in this study. Of the 25 participants, 7 completed all 6 workouts using their instrumented mouthguards. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Peak linear acceleration (PLA), peak angular acceleration (PAA), and total impacts were collected via instrumented mouthguards during 3 preseason workouts using traditional helmets (TRAD condition) and 3 using a TRAD and GCs (GC condition). The TRAD and GC values for PLA, PAA, and total impacts were evaluated using analyses of variance.

resultsNo difference was present between the collapsed mean values for the entire sample between the TRAD and GC conditions for PLA (TRAD = 16.3g ± 2.0g, GC = 17.2g ± 3.3g, P = .20), PAA (TRAD = 992.1 ± 209.2 rad/s2, GC = 1029.4 ± 261.1 rad/s2, P = .51), or the total number of impacts (TRAD = 9.3 ± 4.7, GC = 9.7 ± 5.7, P = .72). Similarly, no difference was observed between the TRAD and GC conditions for PLA (TRAD = 16.1g ± 1.2g, GC = 17.2g ± 2.79g, P = .32), PAA (TRAD = 951.2 ± 95.4 rad/s2, GC = 1038.0 ± 166.8 rad/s2, P = .29), or total impacts (TRAD = 9.6 ± 4.2, GC = 9.7 ± 5.04, P = .32) between sessions for the 7 players who completed all 6 workouts.

conclusionsThese data suggested no difference in head kinematics data (PLA, PAA, and total impacts) when GCs were worn. Therefore, GCs may not be effective in reducing the magnitude of head impacts experienced by NCAA Division I American football players.

Indexed as

FootballHead Protective DevicesMouth ProtectorsAccelerationAthletesAthletic InjuriesBiomechanical PhenomenaCraniocerebral TraumaEquipment DesignHeadHumansMaleYoung Adultconcussionhelmetsstudent-athletestraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID37734732
PMCPMC11220776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.