Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37734322›Full record

ArticleCell systems2023

What cannot be seen correctly in 2D visualizations of single-cell 'omics data?

Shu Wang, Eduardo D Sontag, Douglas A Lauffenburger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell systems, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. SEAL: Spatially-resolved Embedding Analysis with Linked Imaging Data.IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. DeepAtlas: a tool for effective manifold learning.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  8. SEAL : Spatially-resolved Embedding Analysis with Linked Imaging Data.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Diffusive topology preserving manifold distances for single-cell data analysis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shu WangDepartment of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Eduardo D SontagDepartments of Bioengineering and Electrical & Computer Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA. Electronic address: e.sontag@northeastern.edu.
Douglas A LauffenburgerDepartment of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. Electronic address: lauffen@mit.edu.

Funding

IMMUNE MECHANISMS OF PROTECTION AGAINST MYCOBACTERIUM TUBERCULOSIS CENTER (IMPAC-TB)75N93019C00071 · NIAID · HARVARD UNIVERSITY D/B/A HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI FORTUNE, SARAH · 2019 to 2025
$57.3M
Research Project 2 The pregnancy AdaptOMEU19AI167899 · NIAID · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI DOUGLAS A LAUFFENBURGER · 2022 to 2026
$14.7M
NIAID NIH HHS 75N93019C00071NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI167899
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A common strategy for exploring single-cell 'omics data is visualizing 2D nonlinear projections that aim to preserve high-dimensional data properties such as neighborhoods. Alternatively, mathematical theory and other computational tools can directly describe data geometry, while also showing that neighborhoods and other properties cannot be well-preserved in any 2D projection.

Identifiers

PMID37734322
PMCPMC10863674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.